Wish we did have spell check on this software.That's TGT's way of spellcheck.
Wish we did have spell check on this software.That's TGT's way of spellcheck.
Wish we did have spell check on this software.
Really? How do I activate it when I am composing my post in the TGT site?Your browser has spell check built in.
I don't see a SC option in the compose or edit box. Where is it?Nope. I just type in the editor box.
Didn't I just say that in #143?Word even has spell check.
I am using Chrome and have never seen little marks under my posts when I compose or edit them using the TGT software when a word is misspelled.I use Chrome and spellcheck is automatically enabled. If you misspell a word you get little marks under it.
Not happening on mine. Just checked my Chrome settings and SC was and is on.
I got a crappy letter from them when I asked them why they NEVER PUSH BACK after all these false flags are played out.
Never challenge the narratives.
I'm so disgusted that I will not renew my membership they can pound sand.
Until they start making a stand all I see is another group of GOP style hand wringing trying to look concerned and then incrementally give in to appease the NWO cabal and media.
As much as I hate it, ammunition clips are in the dictionary now alongside ammunition magazines as a result of common usage. Words matter, but the cat is out of the bag on this one. But they will always be magazines to me.
I don't always care because I can't. My copy of Firefox is set to United States English by default for display but provides no choice for languages under the spell check function. Unfortunately, it uses British English for spell check. For example, it tells me that "color" is wrong but "colour" is correct. Sometimes it really throws me for a loop but I've learned to ignore it when necessary.I get the same red underscore on my misspelled words and frankly dont give 2 craps.
I'm not sure he views this as throwing anyone under the bus. He's not banning anything by changing the age and maybe, just maybe, Mr. New York City is sufficiently out of touch with his base that, to him, this seems reasonable.Trumps responce was throw them under the buss and support a weapons ban.
I
Or he could just be throwing out something that he figures will never fly and never wind up back on his desk for signature. I think that's pretty likely for the bump stock ban; making that work would require making changes to the language of the NFA and that seems, to me, to be a political non-starter.
I think that's what this is all about. Call me a pie eyed optimist, but I believe Trump, Congressional leadership and even the NRA already know what will or will not get through to his desk and already have contingencies set up in case one or two seem to grow legs.
I hope this is what is happening. But that still has not stopped me from contacting every one of my representatives and the president telling them this is not what I believe they should be supporting...I'm not sure he views this as throwing anyone under the bus. He's not banning anything by changing the age and maybe, just maybe, Mr. New York City is sufficiently out of touch with his base that, to him, this seems reasonable.
Or he could just be throwing out something that he figures will never fly and never wind up back on his desk for signature. I think that's pretty likely for the bump stock ban; making that work would require making changes to the language of the NFA and that seems, to me, to be a political non-starter.
I hope this is what is happening. But that still has not stopped me from contacting every one of my representatives and the president telling them this is not what I believe they should be supporting...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Ok, what other two regulations are they going to get rid of for it? ...or is he going to suspend that EO just for this?https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/28/politics/final-bump-stock-ban/index.html
It looks like the ban is going through. :/