What's that supposed to mean?
You think it's morally acceptable to put someone in prison for such randomness that impacts no one?
Based on what? If there's a law, and the law is ruled just, and the legislators won't change it, how is punishing a willing lawbreaker immoral?
You can argue the law is immoral, but saying the punishment for breaking it is is pushing it.
NFA laws are BS, and unconstitutional regardless of SCOTUS opinion.
Sadly, the corruption of the gov and SCOTUS means constitutionality no longer matters.
You are wrong. The SCOTS determines constitutionality, not you.
You are wrong. The SCOTS determines constitutionality, not you.
Remember the barrel length law is what they used to set up Randy Weaver. Privately sell some shotguns to someone you don't know well. It could happen to you too.
Hitler had a tremendous amount of authority.
Ooh, big scary bad internet-trolling Hitler? My god, every other argument in this thread must bow down to internet Hitler reference and acknowledge its moot-ness...
LOL
Ooh, big scary bad internet-trolling Hitler? My god, every other argument in this thread must bow down to internet Hitler reference and acknowledge its moot-ness...
LOL
Discrediting a conversation or a person because they bring up Hitler is a tactic of the likes of the lefties on Reddit.