I know that this has VERY MUCH to do with barrel twist rate, so I haven't forgotten about its effect.
I have nonetheless read//heard from people, who have shot more .223/5.56x45 than I am ever likely to in the rest of my lifetime, that the 55 gr. BTFMJ (M193?) projectile tends to be more accurate than the 62gr. BTFMJ (M855?) at (for me) more relevant/likely combat ranges (say, 0 to 400 yards). The information I got was that, even for barrels with twist rates optimized for the 62 gr. BTFMJ, the 55gr. projectiles tended to shoot tighter groups.
From people who would know better than I, the putative cause was that the .11" steel ("penetrator"?) core in the 62gr. projectiles was positioned with just very slightly less concentricity than the conventionally-cored 55gr. projectiles. Any opinions/input/surmises/cognitive spit-balls would be welcome.
I have nonetheless read//heard from people, who have shot more .223/5.56x45 than I am ever likely to in the rest of my lifetime, that the 55 gr. BTFMJ (M193?) projectile tends to be more accurate than the 62gr. BTFMJ (M855?) at (for me) more relevant/likely combat ranges (say, 0 to 400 yards). The information I got was that, even for barrels with twist rates optimized for the 62 gr. BTFMJ, the 55gr. projectiles tended to shoot tighter groups.
From people who would know better than I, the putative cause was that the .11" steel ("penetrator"?) core in the 62gr. projectiles was positioned with just very slightly less concentricity than the conventionally-cored 55gr. projectiles. Any opinions/input/surmises/cognitive spit-balls would be welcome.