The 2A speaks for itself, no matter how you all wish to spin it.
Based on that comment, you are one of several who simply need to sit back and read what I write to expand your denominator of knowledge.
No Worries, I am Smart and Got Sig!
Yes, I am sure you know more than the founding fathers and any other statesman that ever lived - I bow to your intelligence and insight oh great king.
The Second Amendment applies DIRECTLY to states, and the states CANNOT make law against it. That is what the original founders wanted, and outlined. The 10th Amendment allows all other aspects of freedom to be dictated by the states, those enumerated in the Constitution, like the 1st and 2nd, are written in stone and cannot legally be trespassed upon.
The right to bear arms is dictated in the 2nd Amendment. I don't give a flying shit what some guy 200 years later thinks, the founding fathers intended for the American populous to be armed, and to bear those arms. Bearing is a simple term that dictates you are carrying a load, in this case, a firearm. Engineering calls for a load bearing wall ... meaning a wall that bears a load. It's quite simple, but people continuously obstruct the obvious because it suits their particular agenda.
I got news for those people ... that's not how the United States has worked. Just because States have gotten away with "reasonable restrictions" does not mean the root and basis of the Constitution cannot be misconstrued to obstruct law abiding citizens from bearing arms.
Perhaps the people in this country are too weak to accept freedom. We're too scared to have anything new for fear of unrest. To think that this country was rooted in such radical social change from the beginning yet we have succumb to rampant weakness and political rape.
Did you defend the Constitution ... or simply your version of it?
The 2A speaks for itself, no matter how you all wish to spin it.
To truely apply the comparison of " Load Bearing", such as in Engineering, we would have to look at changes to that load. Such as adding to the load of a structure. You cant just build additional stories to a building and expect the original structure to support it. That's why you add more columns to support the new additions.
To compair this analogy to the right to keep and bear arms, we must refer to the size of government and the population. When increasing the load, such as population, the second amendment would clearly require more guns to be kept and worn!!
The only Patriotic method to define any Constitutional Amendment is in the words of the people who wrote them.
Todays methods of twisting the founders words are nothing more than infringement to create Elitist laws and restrictions.
Based on that comment, you are one of several who simply need to sit back and read what I write to expand your denominator of knowledge.
No Worries, I am Smart and Got Sig!
I see you can cut and paste. Again, if it would have been left to our Founding Fathers, we would not have had a 2A in the first place!! Again, the Bill of Rights and the 2A were products of the Anti-Federalists at the Constitutional Convention.
I suggest you read, seek first to understand, and then to be understood.
Do you pee your pants when traveling through Arizona. I dont because I actually find their laws to be in line with the 2nd amendment.
If all this crap you claim is true, explain why most other states have better right to carry laws than Texas does?
What the hell are you talking about, cut and paste?
Nothing you post makes any damn sence to me, just like the crap you posted about Texas seceding form the Union because of the crap going on in Mexico.
I guess your ideas are a little over my head.
Spin it my friend.
How about you try being consistent next time?