This will be interesting to watch develop. I do prefer to wait for fact before condemning the cop.
Okay, don't know the whole story. Conflicting reports that she may not have been armed. Eyewitnesses say she wasn't armed.
All I know is that everyone was quick to judge Michael Dunn (loud music guy) and he basically will spend the rest of his life in jail because the guy he shot wasn't armed.
Do we know all the facts in that case? No. Does he get the benefit of the doubt that everyone wants to give to LE? Hell no.
This phrase "benefit of the doubt" is being used to what extent here?
Meaning, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that this shooting probably wasn't justified, as in the Michael Dunn case. We are told by members here, though, to give the cop the benefit of the doubt until more is known, which is rarely offered to the peon individual citizens.
Blame your mass media for that.
You would scream about a CHL holder not being innocent until proven guilty, but since it's a cop he loses all of his rights. Not surprised.
He's a cop, all the fact you need I guess.
Please explain comment.Speaking as a Bastrop resident, this doesn't surprise me in the least.
Speaking as a Bastrop resident, this doesn't surprise me in the least.
Blame your mass media for that.
You would scream about a CHL holder not being innocent until proven guilty, but since it's a cop he loses all of his rights. Not surprised.
He's a cop, all the fact you need I guess.
This phrase "benefit of the doubt" is being used to what extent here?