Texas SOT

AAR: Tactical Immersion: CCW Immersion Feb 25th (San Antonio, Texas)

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • stalker19

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 6, 2012
    274
    1
    Mom's basement
    Hi everyone! On February 25th I had an opportunity to attend Tactical Immersion’s “CCW Immersion” Class. Here I will lay out a brief “hot wash” of why I attended this class, what happened during the class, what gear I used and afterthoughts on the event.

    Why Train?

    My main motivation began during what became 8 years in the Army training and deploying. I have seen on multiple occasions the dire consequences of failure to plan, prepare and train… in short, it ain’t pretty. I attend training courses as often as possible to enhance and maintain a solid skill set in regards to employing a firearm. It doesn't matter if you’re a high speed cool guy kicking in doors overseas, or a suit and tie accountant that wants to protect his family- as with anything in life you need determination, a plan, education and resources if you want to succeed. I love training and pushing myself, I like seeing good guys win and take pride in preparing myself and others to win. Why not?

    Why Tactical Immersion?

    I first met Joseph Bell (owner/lead instructor) on February 5th at the Liberty Hill TGT meet. I had done a bit of research prior to heading out there as I had noticed that they would be a sponsor and I’m always looking for more places that provide quality training(ESPECIALLY local). I wanted to get a read on him while out there, and was able to discuss plenty with them during breaks. In short, I liked what I was hearing from them as far as their background, training methodology, current events, etc. They were motivated with solid experience and seemed eager to pass on that information to others. Later on I decided to go out and see first-hand what their classes were like.

    You can read more about TI instructors and background here:

    Their website: Tactical Immersion

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Tactical-Immersion/174136136009061?sk=wall&filter=12

    Description of the class, from their website: “This course is designed for individuals who carry a concealed pistol and that want to further their skill level to better prepare themselves for the possibility of a life or death encounter. A common factor in modern state authorized concealed handgun licensing programs is that individuals will NOT be trained in the use of that handgun. What many individuals find is that it is not a handgun training course, but more of a rules and laws training course with a handgun proficiency qualification. Many newly licensed individuals end up either learning through other training programs on how to actually use their pistol in a defensive poster, or simply carry their pistol blissfully without further training. This course emphasizes on the training aspects that are not part of the basic licensing course and focuses on developing individuals in the finer aspects of using a pistol for defense. Students can expect to become fully confident in their ability to use their concealed pistol to defend themselves, their loved ones or their property.”

    This is not a CHL licensing class. I’ve had my CHL since 2009 and that class was mostly laws, regulations, etc. There was little information on the proper application of a firearm in self-defense. I shot an absolutely perfect score on the qual, and I did not see any students fail despite some nasty looking targets… which for me indicated that it absolutely was not pushing students to shoot better. It’s essentially enough to ensure you can shoot in the bad guy’s general direction and not hit yourself in the foot.
    The CHL licensing course IS NOT enough to prepare you to defend yourself. Carrying a firearm is, in reality, a large responsibility. A miss on the range after a five second presentation is merely an oopsie; a miss in a violent encounter can mean hitting someone other than your intended target- I don’t need to explain why this is bad. Additionally, it is not a good thing for society when someone tries to save the day with their cool guns and gear, and the bad guy just ends up trumping you… and now is running around with your cool gun and gear while you’re bleeding to death on the ground.

    Getting started:

    The day started with the instructors greeting everyone and we got started with a safety/medical brief. It was direct and clear; the fundamental safety rules were laid out and described as well as a medical plan in case someone became injured in any way during training. After that, students gathered their gear and the range was set up in preparation for the first event.
    Training started with an initial shooting test in which the instructors used as a baseline to see how students could perform on demand. There were three separate strings of fire, all from concealment and on the timer. From here accuracy over speed was continually stressed as time penalties for misses were absolutely devastating. No matter how fast, misses do not turn the odds in your favor. Of course, this sounds like common sense but if you observe a lot of "tactical" shooters at a public range they clearly do not have a firm grasp on this reality. I think the initial test was eye opening for most of the class. Once the entire class shot the qual and times were recorded, Joe brought us in for a quick discussion on the qual as well as a down and dirty hit analysis and a lecture on anatomy as it pertains to shot placement.

    Brilliance in the basics:

    I believe that there is no such thing as an advanced shooter. The best shooters simply perform the fundamentals consistently and on demand and under stress. Most of the top trainers in the country push this concept, and indeed it is the methodology used to forge the best combat shooters in the military. Fundamentals. You can't get by without them. During the initial qual it became clear that many students were having issues with weapon manipulation and reloads, here Joe presented his logic and solutions as they pertained to individual errors. He covered the basics to include grip, trigger control, sight picture, body positioning and breathing. He discussed handgun presentation and reloads for IWB, OWB and different concealment garments.

    When in doubt: grip, sights, trigger- remember that easy checklist and perform all of them reasonably well, you’ll be rewarded with good hits on target.

    From there we shot several drills incorporating presentations from the holster, reloads and group shooting to hone trigger control. We also worked presentations from strong and support hand only- good stuff. You could REALLY see shot groups opening up during support hand only fire, and this really was an eye opener for students. Joe continued working the line and provided input for shooters, and surely enough groups were dialing in. Frequently, if someone was having extensive issues he’d stay to ensure their problems were addressed and shooting cleaned up- good stuff.

    Shooting positions were covered to include: kneeling, prone, rollover prone, and supine. After ensuring all students had a good grasp on that, movement was addressed.

    The class opted for a short 20-30 minute lunch break so that we could stuff some more training in. I believe all instructors and students stayed on site. We discussed training, asked questions, loaded mags and stuffed our faces- pretty standard stuff.
    After lunch the pace picked up dramatically, we immediately progressed further into shooting on the move and multiple target engagement. Again, some students were pushing too fast on the trigger and Joe continually re-emphasized accuracy before speed.

    Room work:

    While this was not a CQB class, we did have a mock room set up and Joe went through the basics of entering and clearing a singular room by yourself. These skills are important, should your home become invaded and you have to secure loved ones, or if you are out in public and need to fight your way to exit a building. Several scenarios were set up and students took turns approaching, opening the door, slicing the pie and entering the room. I think when students encountered hostage targets, they really began to understand the importance of being able to place surgical shots on target. Joe again carefully walked each student through the scenarios and provided feedback, guidance and critique along the way.

    Wrapping up:

    The final training event of the day was to re-shoot the qualifications that we were introduced to at the beginning of the day. This was obviously to gauge performance and to allow instructors and students to see how much they had improved throughout the course. After I shot my second qual, I stood back and observed other students. I noticed that there was a dramatic increase in the accuracy of hits across the board. Some students had indeed come a long way and it was a delight to watch those hits shrink down to respectable and combat effective. I’m sure an instructor or another student can chime in as to exact numbers and percentages, I do not have that information as of right now. I also noticed students performing with increased confidence and efficiency in handgun presentation, body movement mechanics and weapons manipulation. Very, very cool.

    From there, we broke down the range and gathered up to do an informal AAR of the class. Joe encouraged students to provide him with honest feedback and thoughts from the day, both positive and negative were welcome. It was quick and productive and I’d heard many students commenting on how much they’d learned and how much work they need to do in the future. Morale and enthusiasm was high throughout the class and students left wanting more- ALWAYS a good sign!

    Gear:

    There were a variety of handguns and support equipment in the class. Handguns were chambered in 9mm, .40, .45ACP and possibly others. I saw Glock, M&P, XDs, a P30 and a 1911. Methods of carry were IWB, OWB and two of us used appendix carry. There were initially several students fighting with their gear and clothing during presentations and re-holstering. My suggestion here is to do your research, buy good gear, know it well and train until these processes become subconscious. A good holster, mag pouches and belt go a long way in comfort/concealment as well as efficiency and safety when employing your weapon.

    My personal gear list was as follows:
    - Gun/ Ammo: Glock 19 Gen3 with Warren sights. Ammo was Federal and UMC 115 grain FMJ and Speer 124 grain +P JHP. After much trial and error, the medium framed Glocks have become my number one choice for most applications. They are versatile and dependable for anything from concealed carry to uniformed duty use. They are more accurate than many people think; I have taken them out to 100 yards on Larue reduced size steel silhouettes with good results. I had an identical backup gun on hand, but was not needed.
    - Belt: 5.11 leather.
    - Holster: Cane and Derby AIWB
    - Mag pouch: Raven Concealment
    - MSA/Sordin earpro.
    - Eyepro: Oakley Halfjacket
    - Footwear: Asolo boots

    All of these items I’ve used extensively and have come to appreciate and suggest to others as well. When I select gear, aside from something robust and proven- I try to select items that will fit multiple roles. Ideally, you want one club that will allow you to play the whole course.

    Final Thoughts:

    In closing, people who know me are aware that I simply do not endorse things I don’t highly believe in. My primary focus remains the combat and defensive arena. To succeed there you need good people, good equipment and good training or you are setting yourself up for failure. I am confidently able to recommend this course to those who wish to employ a handgun in a defensive role; regardless of background or experience. I’ve come to like the guys at Tactical Immersion as they are experienced, educated and ethical- qualities I find mandatory when looking at instructors. They have clearly worked hard to produce a modern, well rounded curriculum. Their heads are in the game and are working hard to continually refine their training. I really like that. In the case of this class, there is only so much you can cover in an 8 hour block of instruction but they do a great job of using that time wisely. I also understand that most people have a busy life and can only dedicate so much time/resources to individual training sessions. If you’re looking to improve your skills behind the gun, check ‘em out. You will be very pleased with that decision and signing up can be your first step to becoming more prepared!
    Hurley's Gold
     

    Attachments

    • 2.jpg
      2.jpg
      19.8 KB · Views: 101

    Joseph Bell

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 2, 2011
    146
    1
    San Antonio, Texas
    I really appreciate the AAR of the course and I am thrilled that you are giving us your personal recommendation. The following is a breakdown of the reported information on the instructor evaluations, as well as student performance percentages.

    7 out of 9 students had never taken a course like this.
    2 out of 9 had taken this course (Jan 28[SUP]th[/SUP] 2012).
    9 out of 9 stated the course provided information that they were unfamiliar with.
    9 out of 9 stated the course was beneficial to them.
    9 out of 9 stated the course met their expectations.
    9 out of 9 stated they would recommend this course to others.
    9 out of 9 stated the instructor and course material was professional.
    9 out of 9 stated the instructor used clear examples and demonstrations.
    9 out of 9 stated the instructor was professional in making corrections during hands on.

    Instructor knowledge was rated excellent.
    Instructor preparation was rated good to excellent (due to a last minute change in facility some students were not on time or in the right area, this caused some confusion. I will be working to ensure that this does not become an issue in the future).
    Instructor enthusiasm in presentation was rated excellent.

    Things students liked or found the most interesting or helpful:
    Buddy drill
    Shooting on the move, and learning to drive the sights during movement.
    Shooting from cover.
    Situational awareness while performing movement or manipulations.
    Trigger control
    Anticipation of recoil, and recoil management.
    Basic fundamentals and the follow up during advanced drills.

    Things students stated they would like added to the course:
    Increased detail’s on fundamentals.
    None others…

    Things students stated they personally benefited from:

    Repetitions of drills.
    Dynamic movements.
    Learning to drive the sights during shooting on the move.
    Trigger control.
    Minor adjustments to grip, stance and presentation from the holster.
    Weak handed drills.

    Student Comments:
    “Great fundamentally orientated class, a very valuable course for anyone who wishes to employ a handgun for self defense. Will be recommending this course to others.”

    “Enjoyed the course, as well as the improvements made from the last CCW Immersion course I took. Keep up the great work”

    “I learned a lot in this course and I did not realize how much I needed to learn”

    “Excellent course that is well ran and very professional. Safety was stressed throughout the day!”

    “Joe did a great job, making sure we were always safe and ensure we were smooth in our manipulations. I really liked the realism and room clearing.”

    “I learned what I did not know and I am simply blown away, this is a great course and I highly recommend it to anyone! For the price of dinner and a movie I have become confident in protecting my family and myself!”

    Margin of improvement from pre-test to post training test:

    Mark 610% improvement
    Scott 331% improvement
    Jonathan 227% improvement
    Joey 192% improvement
    Cliff 190% improvement
    John 174% improvement
    Wade 167% improvement
    Todd 166% improvement
    Rick 151% Improvement


    My personal review of the 02-25-2012 CCW Immersion course:

    I was deeply disappointed in the range facility issue that arose the week prior to the course, I was notified 4 days prior to the course date, that I would not be able to use a range that had been scheduled several months in advance. This was not the range staff’s fault and I do not hold any ill feeling towards the range or the staff (they are good people and friends). However, the issue was out of their hands and it left me in a bad spot. I was able to find a range and schedule it 3 days before the class, but in the mix of everything lost a few students along the way. This was very disappointing and regrettable.

    I did try and maintain good communications with all students prior to the course, but I did run into some difficulties (by no fault of the students) and this also led to some miscommunications and students not meeting in the proper location on training day. After we rounded up all the students (2 no-shows never returned phone calls or emails) we quickly got the ball rolling and got rounds down range.

    This class was a truly mixed bag of skill level, some who were very proficient and one student who had fired less than 100 rounds prior to this course. This made the day very interesting as I try to gage the classes skill level by the pre-test and adjust the training accordingly to fit the needs of the class. At some points I felt that some of the students were starting to fall behind, however, having Keelan to help (the assistant instructor for this course) allowed me to do some one-on-one corrections as well as keep the class progressing at a steady pace.

    The course itself had some fine tuning between the Jan 28[SUP]th[/SUP] and this Feb 25[SUP]th[/SUP] course. I adjusted the program outline, methods and time allotments to allow for more efficiency and increased repetitions. I believe these adjustments greatly improved the course and I have made them official changes to the program and future courses. The more feedback I get, the more I can fine tune this course to meet the current needs of the individuals who seek training from us.

    The only drawbacks that I was able to identify were that I still need to find a way to cut down on the time used to run the pre and post testing. I think I need to do more exploring in this area and find ways to cut that time down, so that I can focus more on specific training aspects that I feel are not being covered as well as they could be. Also I will be making some slight adjustments based on the student feedback during our post training AAR.

    Overall the course went very well and I am very pleased in the performance increased by each individual student. I do believe the Tactical Immersion team is developing one the most comprehensive concealed carry courses in the country, and I hope that we can continue to improve this program and assist individual students in becoming confident, skilled and safe armed citizens.

    I have a bunch of pictures that I will be getting back in a few days, I will post a few up here in the next couple of weeks, and I will also be adding a bunch to our facebook and main website. Also we will be announcing the rest of our 2012 schedule in the next coming weeks; check in on us if you are interested in what we are doing and looking for training that will improve your skill sets.

    ***If you are interested in hosting a CCW Immersion course in your area, contact us at info@tacticalimmersion.com and we will do everything we can to assist you in doing so. ****
     
    Top Bottom