Capitol Armory ad

Ban on guns in post offices is unconstitutional, US Judge Rules

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • cycleguy2300

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 19, 2010
    6,910
    96
    Austin, Texas
    BUT only if you are on the clock. The language of these laws is very slippery.
    Texas CCP does not distinguish between "on-duty" and "off-duty"
    ********
    Art. 2.13. DUTIES AND POWERS. (a) It is the duty of every peace officer to preserve the peace within the officer's jurisdiction. To effect this purpose, the officer shall use all lawful means.

    (b) The officer shall:

    (1) in every case authorized by the provisions of this Code, interfere without warrant to prevent or suppress crime
    ********
    To that end, I carry a handgun in the exercise of my duties.

    Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
     

    Wiliamr

    Well-Known
    TGT Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Apr 15, 2011
    1,817
    96
    Austin
    Texas CCP does not distinguish between "on-duty" and "off-duty"
    ********
    Art. 2.13. DUTIES AND POWERS. (a) It is the duty of every peace officer to preserve the peace within the officer's jurisdiction. To effect this purpose, the officer shall use all lawful means.

    (b) The officer shall:

    (1) in every case authorized by the provisions of this Code, interfere without warrant to prevent or suppress crime
    ********
    To that end, I carry a handgun in the exercise of my duties.

    Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
    I agree totally. Back in early mid 70's HPD position was you were "on duty" 24 - 7. Texas law pretty much allowed the same thing, BUT arguments were made that the official schedule for patrol officers dictated "official duty time" I can not remember exactly what kicked those issues into gear, but some changes were made.
     

    MountainGirl

    Happy to be here!
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Dec 22, 2022
    4,317
    96
    Ten Oaks
    ...

    The logic used being that the 2nd Amendment does not specify the "arms" used by the "militia" and hence where not specifically prohibited, it can be regulated. In my opinion (which will not even get you a used Starbucks cup in a competent court of law) that logic is flawed in several ways. Mainly, the 2nd Amendment is not a gift to the people, it is a restriction on Government. Hence the government can not define what is "allowed" to the people. The 2nd Amendment dictates what the people allow the government.
    That. In spades.
     

    MountainGirl

    Happy to be here!
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Dec 22, 2022
    4,317
    96
    Ten Oaks
    And before one specific judge.

    I would doubt the US Attorney will appeal it. Take the L on this one charge/case and not risk anything bigger. Could lead to a vacate of USC930, some building s would survive, but others like National Parks Visitor Centers would not.
    And that.
     

    cycleguy2300

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 19, 2010
    6,910
    96
    Austin, Texas
    It is a federal offense, so federal definition of official duties. Decades of Federal Case Law. Former Fed here, we had to deputized local to get around it.
    It's something I'm willing to risk/fight given my rights protected in 2a and my duties as described by Texas CCP.

    Many times, officers have been off the clock, and gotten involved in a deadly force incident stopping a robbery or shooting etc and their departments said they were exercising their official duties.

    I've counted the cost and would rather be a martyr than a victim.

    Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
     

    Wiliamr

    Well-Known
    TGT Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Apr 15, 2011
    1,817
    96
    Austin
    It's something I'm willing to risk/fight given my rights protected in 2a and my duties as described by Texas CCP.

    Many times, officers have been off the clock, and gotten involved in a deadly force incident stopping a robbery or shooting etc and their departments said they were exercising their official duties.

    I've counted the cost and would rather be a martyr than a victim.

    Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
    If Sir, you ever run afoul of the bastards.... I will help break you out.
     

    DocBeech

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 6, 2023
    92
    26
    Paradise
    Something to think about.

    1) You can legally carry a firearm into a Bank.
    2) They don't want you to legally carry a firearm into the post office?

    I mean really... You can in a bank... Just let that settle.
     

    motorcarman

    Compulsive Collector
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Feb 13, 2015
    4,745
    96
    Rural Wise County, TX.
    If the 11th Circuit upholds the FL ruling, it could set up a circuit split and make the issue ripe for cert. by SCOTUS.

    At that point the question becomes if a Post Office is a "sensitive place" per Bruen.

    Courts, LE facilities, schools, and even hospitals are considered "sensitive places" depending on the state.

    There is a reasonable chance SCOTUS would consider postal facilities to be the same.

    Not that I like it, because as others have noted it's a PITA to have to stash a gun to go into one.
    Maybe a SENSITIVE PLACE was because 'way back when' there was a phrase "GOING POSTAL" or "THE GUY WENT POSTAL".

    It seems many postal employees were bringing firearms to work and "OFFING' people that pissed them off?

    I haven't heard that phrase in many years but I still remember news stories about disgruntled Postal People.
     
    Last edited:

    Renegade

    SuperOwner
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 5, 2008
    11,779
    96
    Texas
    Maybe a SENSITIVE PLACE was because 'way back when' there was a phrase "GOING POSTAL" or "THE GUY WENT POSTAL".

    It seems many postal employees were bringing firearms to work a "OFFING' people that pissed them off?

    I haven't heard that phrase in many years but I still remember news stories about disgruntled Postal People.

    Well this is the perfect case to find out since the defendant was a postal worker

    Of course the ban predates anyone going postal.
     

    DoubleDuty

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Feb 9, 2019
    3,773
    96
    DFW
    Maybe a SENSITIVE PLACE was because 'way back when' there was a phrase "GOING POSTAL" or "THE GUY WENT POSTAL".

    It seems many postal employees were bringing firearms to work a "OFFING' people that pissed them off?

    I haven't heard that phrase in many years but I still remember news stories about disgruntled Postal People.
    Yeah they had shootings by nut jobs they fired. So the law abiding get punished.
     
    Every Day Man
    Tyrant

    Support

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    116,537
    Messages
    2,967,685
    Members
    35,093
    Latest member
    Busy rookies
    Top Bottom