I looked up the definition of FUDD on Urban Dictionary and it said Lonesome Dove...No it’s not. people who are “a gun owner, but…” are more harmful than this guy carrying a rifle while buying beer.
I looked up the definition of FUDD on Urban Dictionary and it said Lonesome Dove...No it’s not. people who are “a gun owner, but…” are more harmful than this guy carrying a rifle while buying beer.
WELL EVERYON KNOWS THAT SOMEOVERALL WEARING WHITE-TRASH REDNECK MAKES A BETTER SPOKES MAN THAN SOME SUIT WEARING TIGHT ASS!<>
I grew-op in an always OC legal area. we often carried even as kids, and few paid any attention to it.
During the intervening years, a false stigma was attached to ALL firearms ownership, and many quit the legal practice over “public disapproval”. Indeed, some jurisdictions, like the gun-friendly Florida, even made O C illegal.
This has left the general public with distrust and uneasiness around armed citizens.
One extremely important facet, which I can’t recall being covered here is this: The public needs to become re-accustomed to seeing armed people. Normal looking, non-threatening everyday men & women. People going about their daily activities.
In recent years, in Texas & other places, most OC’ers I’ve seen in public places have been poorly dressed, unkempt youngish men.
The public should see better-dressed folks, neater, carrying as they go about their daily activities. This should re-acclimate folks to the fact that they are often surrounded by armed non-criminal Citizens, whether they know it, or not.
We cannot allow our RIGHTS to be diminished by the foolish opinions of a multitude of Karens.
The few times I have OC’d lately, I’m sometimes asked if I were a LEO. I smile & say no, just an old retired Doc who once was a US Army Captain, but my Son is a career LEO. Everyone seems satisfied with that.
Let’s all try to make other folks become comfortable.
leVieux
.
<>No it’s not. people who are “a gun owner, but…” are more harmful than this guy carrying a rifle while buying beer.
YOURE JUST LOOKING FOR SOME ELSE TO BOYCOTT RIGHT?<>
Yes, sadly, some on our side, but with very poor judgemet, insisted on carrying their military style rifles into restaurants.
This caused great backlash.
Results include the confusing Texas sign-prohibition laws, which have hurt us all.
Folks asked, quite reasonably; ”Who are these people and why do they feel need to carry rifles in restaurants?”
Threats often produce results opposite of those intended.
<>
I think that if a person has a specific need, then rifle carrying may be OK; but never just to intimidate others.Only a dickhead would carry a rifle. All it's doing is f---ing over everything to do with firearms.
I think that if a person has a specific need, then rifle carrying may be OK; but never just to intimidate others.
It's quite clear you don't see the whole picture.No it’s not. people who are “a gun owner, but…” are more harmful than this guy carrying a rifle while buying beer.
CuteI looked up the definition of FUDD on Urban Dictionary and it said Lonesome Dove...
INSULTS COME OUT WHEN SOMEONE HAS NO INTELLGENT RECOURSE!Cute
I bet your talking about @leVieux. Since me has be on ignore, I don't know if he's still being himself (which I would bet he is) or not.YOURE JUST LOOKING FOR SOME ELSE TO BOYCOTT RIGHT?
the same group that is actually the reason both open carry of handguns and constitutional carry have been signed into law? I remember the media trying to make a big deal about them carrying into a restaurant once, only to find out that the restaurant actually gave them permission ahead of time.<>
Yes, sadly, some on our side, but with very poor judgemet, insisted on carrying their military style rifles into restaurants.
This caused great backlash.
Results include the confusing Texas sign-prohibition laws, which have hurt us all.
Folks asked, quite reasonably; ”Who are these people and why do they feel need to carry rifles in restaurants?”
Threats often produce results opposite of those intended.
<>
Feel free to show me.It's quite clear you don't see the whole picture.
the same group that is actually the reason both open carry of handguns and constitutional carry have been signed into law? I remember the media trying to make a big deal about them carrying into a restaurant once, only to find out that the restaurant actually gave them permission ahead of time.
I did’t mean as in “brandishing”, but just like “See me, I’ve got this rifle” type of intimidation.This would be illegal.
I did’t mean as in “brandishing”, but just like “See me, I’ve got this rifle” type of intimidation.
<>the same group that is actually the reason both open carry of handguns and constitutional carry have been signed into law? I remember the media trying to make a big deal about them carrying into a restaurant once, only to find out that the restaurant actually gave them permission ahead of time.
Feel free to show me.
<>Isn't that the same, just using different words.
<>
NO, “brandishing” has a legal definition. It is not the same as openly carrying, despite what liberals say & think.
<>
<>Yes, I meant the "see me, I've got a gun" comment.