Some good stuff... it begins
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/08-1521.pdf
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/08-1521.pdf
Is there a time frame for their decision? Ive been worried ever since tuesday!
I think that a decision is expected in June.
Some good stuff... it begins
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/08-1521.pdf
They like to use the term militia too, yet they dont seem to know what that means either: : "the whole body of able-bodied male citizens declared by law as being subject to call to military service"at the idiot in the brief that argued the 2A was ONLY protection against the Federal gov't disarming the militia...what an idiot...the progressive anti-gun moron needs to read the 2A...."people"?....
at the idiot in the brief that argued the 2A was ONLY protection against the Federal gov't disarming the militia...what an idiot...the progressive anti-gun moron needs to read the 2A...."people"?....
This is indeed their argument. As i understand history, the orginal Bill of Rights was initially intended as protection against the Federal Govt. Over the years, mostly thru the 14th Amendment and the "due process" clause involving SCOTUS decisions, many parts of the Bill of Rights such as the 1A, 4A, 5, 6, 7, and 8th Amendments were incorporated into the States. The 2A has not to my knowledge been "incorporated" to the States yet by the "due process" clause.
The real argument here will most likely be around the 14A.