I've read all 90 pages on this thread. Just caught up.
The fact is she entered someone else's home. Then she shot them. To death. Not her house. No legal or justifiable reason for her to be there.
If anything, her being an officer makes her 'more' guilty- to me, at least: I expect cops to be able to work schedules such as she worked that week and still make critical, life-altering decisions- and come out the other side having mostly made reasonable and prudent decisions.
Sorry that she was confused, but I don't think that's a sound, or legal, defense. Otherwise, we should all get out of tickets whenever we're confused about where the speed limits change...
The fact is she entered someone else's home. Then she shot them. To death. Not her house. No legal or justifiable reason for her to be there.
If anything, her being an officer makes her 'more' guilty- to me, at least: I expect cops to be able to work schedules such as she worked that week and still make critical, life-altering decisions- and come out the other side having mostly made reasonable and prudent decisions.
Sorry that she was confused, but I don't think that's a sound, or legal, defense. Otherwise, we should all get out of tickets whenever we're confused about where the speed limits change...