Yes it is. A misdemeanor conviction for domestic violence is a bar to CHL ( or gun ownership in general thaks to the lautenberg amendment).
Yes it is. A misdemeanor conviction for domestic violence is a bar to CHL ( or gun ownership in general thaks to the lautenberg amendment).
I don't see this as 'somestic violence.' In most states laws 'Domestic' is defined as pertaining to the family. Don't know what it is in that state. But reading the article is appeared as though the altercation was between a serviceman and a gang member over the gang's territorial rights. I don't think I would call that domestic violence by any stretch of the definitions.
.
Actually, and Class A or B conviction in the last 5 years, or a conviction for a class C Disorderly Conduct is enough to deny a CHL.
There you go. Same thing goes for a person with a CHL. Disorderly conduct can lead to a revoked CHL.Actually, and Class A or B conviction in the last 5 years, or a conviction for a class C Disorderly Conduct is enough to deny a CHL.
I did not realize a time frame was involved, my mistake.
Yep, a conviction will result in a revocation for 5 years, then there is a 2 year revocation "penalty".There you go. Same thing goes for a person with a CHL. Disorderly conduct can lead to a revoked CHL.
The domestic violence conviction is a permanent disqualification, as it makes one ineligible under federal law to posses a handgun.
It is not. However, He was referring to the post that said a misdemeanor was not enough to deny a CHL. I don't think he was responding to the article.
Actually, and Class A or B conviction in the last 5 years, or a conviction for a class C Disorderly Conduct is enough to deny a CHL.
he gets crazy on a full moonAs I read the regs for disorderly conduct, that would include 'mooning' someone or yelling in a provocative way? That could disqualify whole generations!
As I read the regs for disorderly conduct, that would include 'mooning' someone or yelling in a provocative way? That could disqualify whole generations!
[BoT] Jack;199791 said:Yes, there are a crap load of misdemeanors that could bar you from owning a gun. But losing your rights over a DV misdemeanor conviction is not permanent. There's a host of ways to regain your rights if you were convicted on those grounds.
However, I think it's ridiculous that it is such. I can't stand the DV laws. Some of them may be good, but others are complete crap. I also don't like the whole restricting the rights of a freeman for any reason. As I have said many times, if the man/woman is safe enough to be free, then they are safe enough to have all of their rights intact. As for my argument to support this stance, see any argument against GFZs. It's the same argument.