The personal choice would be telling them in the first place. It's none of their business.
"Terms of employment" makes it their business.
The personal choice would be telling them in the first place. It's none of their business.
So, if I have it but don't know that I have it, would I need to be vaccinated against it?
I don't think I would get one. All those that do will probably develop horns or something a few months afterward and will want to get a new Microsoft product instead of a freedom loving gun
How cold? KiddingMany are jumping on the 'vaccine bandwagon' and I say: Fine by me, but it'll be a cold day in hell before I get one...or two.
"Terms of employment" makes it their business.
You admit that 2% die and you won't take a vaccine that has about a 94% effective rate (not 75%) and then you say 98 is higher than 75 and you think that is smart? I agree 98 is higher than 75. Dumbest comparison I have ever seen.98% survival rate
75% effectivity rate.
Hmm not a mathematician but 98 is higher than 75.
Carry on sheeple.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NOPE.
What you do on your time (travel, yank your crank,drink til ya fall down) is NOT your employers business.
What you do on their time YES.
What you do on your own time
NOPE.
But we all make choices.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hmm not a mathematician but 98 is higher than 75.
Ever been in the military?...while some consider personal freedom 'just that' and no, sigh, not to get drunk and drive etc, but some folk just don't mind being told how to jump...or think 'dammit', if I have to comply with rules outside the scope of my job, say like your company mandating you must get a so-called vaccine shot to stay employed, so they insist you have give up too...reminds of a crawfish escaping the bucket and then being pulled back down into the bucket by the other captives...
Some of us value our freedom more than others.
NOPE.
What you do on your time (travel, yank your crank,drink til ya fall down) is NOT your employers business.
What you do on their time YES.
What you do on your own time
NOPE.
But we all make choices.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You admit that 2% die and you won't take a vaccine that has about a 94% effective rate (not 75%) and then you say 98 is higher than 75 and you think that is smart? I agree 98 is higher than 75. Dumbest comparison I have ever seen.
Three words ... random drug test
Now argue what folks do on their own time is none of an employer's business. And don't say "apples and oranges" because the issue being argued now is an employer generating policies surrounding continued employment.
If you go to work contagious with C19 and 1/2 the work forces gets sick and goes home, where does that leave the business? What if your kid was at the school where my daughter teaches and she came back and gave the virus to him/her and made him/her even moderately sick, you telling me you wouldn't care?
You'd be the first Karen jumping up and down screaming for prosecution for reckless endangerment.
A shot in the arm, regardless of it's effectiveness, is a very small price to pay to be able to visit your kid after 2 years.
Regardless ... I'm not going to argue any longer about this. It's sad to see someone so blinded by ideology that can't see common sense or at a minimum, respect someone else's POV.
Look harder my friend. Pfizer and Moderna 94+.Nope wont take it regardless.
Not scared
Show me 98 effectivity also. Everything I seen (aint looked hard) is 75osh
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
From a clinical trial where the actual exposure rate to Covid post vaccination was extremely low... Show me the trial where everyone who received the vaccine was actually exposed to the virus under controlled conditions?Look harder my friend. Pfizer and Moderna 94+.