Does the school zone still apply if the school is closed? I ride my bicycle through a school if no cars are in the parking lot and school is closed.
Pretty much. An ltc or any chl is infringement. Having permission from the state doesn’t stop people from waking up and wanting to commit a crime.My view on any licensing, pertaining to firearms, whether have one or not, is fun registration. Its also citizens saying the government has a right to infringe on the 2’nd, 4’th amendments at the very least. The nature of presenting it because you were detained it on the premises of proving innocence. Yes, the person stopped or detained should being showing signs of suspicion, not just in the wrong neighborhood or whatever.
Does the school zone still apply if the school is closed? I ride my bicycle through a school if no cars are in the parking lot and school is closed.
Well it is plenty enforceable if they know you are coming.Whether it applies or not is irrelevant. The question is whether it’s enforceable. Who has jurisdiction to stop you while riding your bicycle?
Do those agencies have the ability to charge you under federal law?
What concerns me, is that the mechanisms is there to arrest people for this kind of stuff. Just because it hasn’t happened yet, doesnt mean it wont.Well it is plenty enforceable if they know you are coming.
In the original case, school authorities were tipped off Lopez was bringing a gun to school and arrested him as he arrived.
No Federal authorities were present, but the next day a deal was worked out and state charges dropped, and Federal charges made.
So I think the lesson here is if you are going to be actually carrying on school property (as opposed to down an Interstate 850 ft away), the less people who know the better.
Don't know about your, but I tend to avoid business' that are posted. There is always another that is not. In the case there is not, there is always Online Shopping!My favorite are the locations with signs prohibiting concealed carry holders from carrying but no signage for people who are not-licensed. So you can only carry if you are un-licensed.
The Federal Courts here have prohibited enforcement of the State “1000’ law”, b/c there is no practical way for a person to know where the ‘’zones’’ are.I am pretty sure there’s a exception to the 1000 ft law of certain buildings, but asking, cause I honestly don’t know, but what about driving past said buildings going down the road?. Or picking up/dropping off someone at said institutions?
<>Its not that we don’t need law’s as law is what keeps societies within boundaries and sets rules that all agree upon. It’s when laws are written to infringe your constitutional rights and make good honest people get into trouble. Criminals dont necessarily care about any laws, (what is a definition of a criminal, as one would define it as breaking any law, others would suggest its when people have ill intents on doing nefarious acts), and anarchy isn’t a good way of life, so the requirement is good people with a good moral footing and caring for your neighbor rights as well, not just your own.
At some point, when so many laws are created, you get to where it’s the same as no laws, which is both bad and disheartening. Its the same as the little boy crying wolf, once you cry so many times, nobody listens…
In my opinion more laws, like we are talking about, actually creates more danger. It isolates those at risk from anyone willing to protect them. Its a coral, to herd people into trains in my view. Yes there are stupid people out there, maybe we’ll meaning, but is it because of more laws that make guns a thing not readily used or shared, that a lot of people don’t have healthy exposure to get experience and respect for them?<>
These issues have been discussed extensively, here & elsewhere.
My bottom line is this: These restrictive laws applying to regular Citizens always disarm only the WRONG people; thus seriously harming public safety.
”GunFree Zones” is a concept of rigid, non-understanding zealots; not those of us who seek actual improved safety for all.
Even worse is the politically inspired forced disarmament of our on-duty Military Officers.
Way back when the USS Cole was almost sunk by terrorists in a little rubber boat, we wondered how this could have happened. Media wouldn’t tell us. We later learned that the deck guards were patrolling with empty rifles per presidential order. They were not allowed to have ammo, so they just watched.
These zones have resulted in many unnecessary deaths of innocents, yet continue.
leVieux
.
Of course. . . . .In my opinion more laws, like we are talking about, actually creates more danger. It isolates those at risk from anyone willing to protect them. Its a coral, to herd people into trains in my view. Yes there are stupid people out there, maybe we’ll meaning, but is it because of more laws that make guns a thing not readily used or shared, that a lot of people don’t have healthy exposure to get experience and respect for them?
<>Whether it applies or not is irrelevant. The question is whether it’s enforceable. Who has jurisdiction to stop you while riding your bicycle?
Do those agencies have the ability to charge you under federal law?
Does a Texas LTC change the ability of an agency to charge you and, if so, how?