XDM … underrated?

[Axxe55]

Someones spicy today. My shitbox XD has been top notch reliable for a decade, guess i got me one of the good ones. Phew.

I LOVE HOW PEOPL LOVE TO TALK UP HOW PERFECT GLOCKS ARE IN COMPARISIN TO OTHER BRANDSWHEN IN REALITY THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF RELIABLE PISTOLS ON THE MARKET AND JUST AS RELIABLE AS GLOCKRELLY COMES DOWN TO PERSONAL PREFERENCE AND LEARNING TO SHOOT AND CARE FOR THE ONE YOU PLAN ON CARRYING AND USING! EVERYTHING ELSE IS JUST CONFUSING BACKGROUND NOISE THAT SHOULD BE IGNORED

 

[zackmars]

Berettas are durable guns, however if you over clean and under maintain like the military, it'll fall apart real quick.

The gun on my hip is on the cusp of hitting 40k. It's just as tight and smooth as the day i got it. It just looks real beat up now.

 

[A1Oni]

Berettas are durable guns, however if you over clean and under maintain like the military, it'll fall apart real quick.

The gun on my hip is on the cusp of hitting 40k. It's just as tight and smooth as the day i got it. It just looks real beat up now.

thats the thing that annoys me when I hear some brovet hating on berettas for being bad when the beretta they were given was made in 1986 and has been put through the wringer.

 

[GennadiyB]

thats the thing that annoys me when I hear some brovet hating on berettas for being bad when the beretta they were given was made in 1986 and has been put through the wringer.

Those things were work horses, the 92FS will always hold a special place in my heart. People just wanted to talk shit because they were big heavy with a heavy first pull but they were awesome. Actually i prefer them over the sig 320 we get now.

 

[Darqhelmet]

And here I thought we already did this dance:

what are the issues with the xd?

XD’s do some things better than Glock. It’s been my experience one of those is accuracy. I understand anyone’s point of view why they think I’m wrong about this next opinion. Gen4 glocks disappoint. I will not mess with another one. Gen 3 all day. The striker indicator breaking is or was a...

www.texasguntalk.com

It says Springfield on it. That is enough for me to never buy one.

 

[A1Oni]

Those things were work horses, the 92FS will always hold a special place in my heart. People just wanted to talk shit because they were big heavy with a heavy first pull but they were awesome. Actually i prefer them over the sig 320 we get now.

The SIG M17 is garbage imo

 

[Axxe55]

Those things were work horses, the 92FS will always hold a special place in my heart. People just wanted to talk shit because they were big heavy with a heavy first pull but they were awesome. Actually i prefer them over the sig 320 we get now.

THE BERRETTA92FS IS NOT SUITED TO PEOPLE WITH SMALL HANDS IS ABOUT THE ONLY FAULT THEY HAVE IMO!

 

[Txhighlander]

THE BERRETTA92FS IS NOT SUITED TO PEOPLE WITH SMALL HANDS IS ABOUT THE ONLY FAULT THEY HAVE IMO!

That is why the 92 x is available. I can't quite reach the da trigger on a 92 fs without adjusting my hold on the weapon. I have no such problem with the 92x. As far as the xd, tried them and found them wanting.

 

[seeker_two]

The SIG M17 is garbage imo

Your GOAT GUNS don't pertain to this discussion.....

 

[zackmars]

Your GOAT GUNS don't pertain to this discussion.....

I mean the 320 is not a good gun. You think the militaries issues with maintenance on the M9 was bad? Wait till the M17 and M18 start getting some years on them.

 

[A1Oni]

Your GOAT GUNS don't pertain to this discussion.....

my guy I don't know about you, but I actually shoot unlike some people.

 

[zackmars]

It's unfair to the XD to hold it next to Glock, Beretta, S&W, CZ, SIG...

The HS2000 was a $300 import pistol. It's comparison should be Ruger, Canik, Taurus, etc. Compared to those, it's not a bad gun, especially considering the design is over 20 years old.

 

[A1Oni]

It's unfair to the XD to hold it next to Glock, Beretta, S&W, CZ, SIG...

The HS2000 was a $300 import pistol. It's comparison should be Ruger, Canik, Taurus, etc. Compared to those, it's not a bad gun, especially considering the design is over 20 years old.

sig isnt top dog anymore considering their QC went into the shitter the last decade or so

 

[zackmars]

sig isnt top dog anymore considering their QC went into the shitter the last decade or so

Hey I'm trying to be fair and diplomatic.

 

[smittyb]

my guy I don't know about you, but I actually shoot unlike some people.

View attachment 391003

That doesn’t look like a Sig M17…

 

[Axxe55]

sig isnt top dog anymore considering their QC went into the shitter the last decade or so

A MEMBER HERE WAS SHOOTING A SIG P229 BACK IN APRIL AND IT FUNCTIONED FLAWLESSLY ALL DAY WITH NOT ONE PROBLEM, AND WAS DECENTLY ACCURATE AS WELL!

 

[A1Oni]

Hey I'm trying to be fair and diplomatic.

Id rather be honest before fair, but thats just me.

 

[A1Oni]

That doesn’t look like a Sig M17…

why would I carry trash?

 

[A1Oni]

A MEMBER HERE WAS SHOOTING A SIG P229 BACK IN APRIL AND IT FUNCTIONED FLAWLESSLY ALL DAY WITH NOT ONE PROBLEM, AND WAS DECENTLY ACCURATE AS WELL!

was it a west german or made before sig went to shit?

 

[Axxe55]

was it a west german or made before sig went to shit?

I HAVE NO IDEA WASN'T MY PISTOLA!