Maybe. I remember how they thought Joker was great until people on the right liked it. Then it was an evil incel movie.Left leaning critics are giving it rave reviews..................
That alone says a lot.......................
Maybe. I remember how they thought Joker was great until people on the right liked it. Then it was an evil incel movie.Left leaning critics are giving it rave reviews..................
That alone says a lot.......................
Maybe. I remember how they thought Joker was great until people on the right liked it. Then it was an evil incel movie.
So who won.Just watched it, I liked it. The movie never picked sides and actually left politics out of it. It also never said why there is a civil war going on, besides states seceding.
The movie is about a few journalists driving to DC and the horrors of war they see. They see some brutal shit and the last firefights are good. I'd see it again.
Just watched it, I liked it. The movie never picked sides and actually left politics out of it. It also never said why there is a civil war going on, besides states seceding.
The movie is about a few journalists driving to DC and the horrors of war they see. They see some brutal shit and the last firefights are good. I'd see it again.
Evo IMAX theater in Waxahachie.Where did you see it at?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Evo IMAX theater in Waxahachie.
Author is using the movies ambiguity to push his political slant. Maybe it is what he said, maybe it isn't. Watch it and decide for yourself. If the President was depicted as a minority would that change anything and all of a sudden make the movie good? The press secretary for the President was a minority female, does that mean she was supposed to represent Jean-Pierre? You can argue the movie came out of Hollywood so automatically is a slanted pos but this author is reaching.‘Civil War’ Review: Ridiculously Dopey, Anti-Trump Snuff Film
The idea "Civil War" is not partisan is a lie, cinematic-roofie slipped into a publicity campaign to bend us Trumptards over the seats.www.breitbart.com
Author is using the movies ambiguity to push his political slant. Maybe it is what he said, maybe it isn't. Watch it and decide for yourself. If the President was depicted as a minority would that change anything and all of a sudden make the movie good? The press secretary for the President was a minority female, does that mean she was supposed to represent Jean-Pierre? You can argue the movie came out of Hollywood so automatically is a slanted pos but this author is reaching.
Oh, I don't know. I could see it come to a boil and the Californians that do not live in SanFrancisco, LA or any of the other liberal toilets, rise up against the idiots running that state. If that happened, then while they have the inertia refocus thier efforts on DC.CA and Texas......lol...not fucking hardly............
Texas and a few of our neighbors....................quite possible...............
Oh, I don't know. I could see it come to a boil and the Californians that do not live in SanFrancisco, LA or any of the other liberal toilets, rise up against the idiots running that state. If that happened, then while they have the inertia refocus thier efforts on DC.
FIFY"IF" the San Andreas goes wildly active and drops Kali into the Pacific and the sea rises a foot then no expectation for a civil war…
That was my take but the wife wanted to go see a movie and I had no interest in the Ghostbuster ripoff/rehash/money grab.I think I’m gonna wait till it hits streaming.