<>Apparently the military has examined the trade-offs and decided a certain level of gang activity is acceptable. Not desired, mind you, but acceptable. There's always someone of a higher rank who is technically responsible for bad behavior and can either fix it when it gets out of hand or be held accountable after the fact.
Now, given the large number of law enforcement agencies that are home to truly aggressive gangs, I'm leaning towards not doing anything with even a remote chance of making that problem worse. The higher ranked people who can fix those problems, unlike the military, are more distant from the problems or more vulnerable to retaliation from the gangs.
The idea has merit. I could see some great individual LEOs resulting from helping serious immigrants who want to assimilate into the US. The downside risk, though, is too horrific to flirt with.
My concern in making the post was mostly about those from Latin American countries. The cartels reach has steadily increased into the U.S. because there are known and exploited shortages of personnel along the border, as well as larger cities where a good chunk of drugs and people are moved. The current administration is not helping matters either.Maybe I'm reading this wrong, but it seems like we're all talking about legal immigrants from Mexico or Latin America. There are immigrants from other countries that would probably have less risk of being in gangs.
See my post. It has happened and will.My concern in making the post was mostly about those from Latin American countries. The cartels reach has steadily increased into the U.S. because there are known and exploited shortages of personnel along the border, as well as larger cities where a good chunk of drugs and people are moved. The current administration is not helping matters either.
I’m not 100% against this, but I see so many police departments are woefully understaffed and it seems they would jump at the chance to fill their ranks with any warm body. To me, this bill seems to play right into the hands of those who would be ripe for corruption, blackmail, and bribery.
That's probably the worst example in the USA. Basically, the LA County Sheriff's office is nothing but a bunch of rival gangs, each trying to outdo the next in brutality and senseless violence. The few LEOs who have joined in the naive belief they could make things better seem to wind up leaving quickly, joining a gang, riding a desk, or mysteriously not getting any backup when they get into trouble on the street.Read about the la county sheriff’s office in California.
If we'd open up immigration to folks from Venezuela, as many as want to come, we'd be better off for it. Those folks have seen communism up close and they know better than to fall into those traps again. Or at least they can recognize the traps.My other bud is from Venezuela...
It’s irrelevant to have an opinion because if the person is a citizen blah blah blah they should be able to do it.
I just will try to be civil when I can’t understand what police are saying.
That’s a problem whether you’re immigrant or not. I can’t count the number of unintelligible LEOs who believed saying it louder increased comprehension to the point of a unnecessary death.…Point is, marginal English skills can get someone killed if weapons ae involved. If perm residents can become LEOs, not only background checks but English proficiency testing is a must.