200 or 230 Grain

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Mr Larry

    New Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 21, 2013
    13
    1
    Texas
    Witch is the best and y? I have a 1911 and an XD in 45 ACP and have shot both well. Some like the 200 grain and say it is the best and on the other hand some say the 230 Grain is best. So how likes what and y. Would like your thoughts on this. Thanks
     

    Charlie

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Mar 19, 2008
    63,717
    96
    'Top of the hill, Kerr County!
    One is not "better" than the other. And, IMO, any differences would be hard to identify. Individual guns like certain loads and bullets, etc. I hand load both and both have performed great. I would guess that it would be very difficult if not impossible to tell the difference in shooting a hand loaded 200 gr. Silvertip (for example) and a hand loaded 230 gr. Silvertip. Just my two bits.
     

    rsayloriii

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 11, 2009
    3,314
    31
    H-Town, TX
    Depends on how recoil sensitive you are. 230 gr is going to recoil more than 200 gr. For ever action there's an equal and opposite reaction... larger mass to move = more recoil towards you.

    sent from deep space
     

    Vaquero

    Moving stuff to the gas prices thread.....
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Apr 4, 2011
    40,525
    96
    Dixie Land
    Depends on how recoil sensitive you are. 230 gr is going to recoil more than 200 gr. For ever action there's an equal and opposite reaction... larger mass to move = more recoil towards you.

    sent from deep space


    Not exactly true. Most of the .45 rounds carry powder charges to create the same amount of energy.
    While the 230 is heavier and will travel slower, the 200 will travel faster. This results in near equal muzzle and downrange energy, also equal felt recoil.

    As stated before, not much difference, other than point of impact relative to point of aim.
     

    Charlie

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Mar 19, 2008
    63,717
    96
    'Top of the hill, Kerr County!
    Not exactly true. Most of the .45 rounds carry powder charges to create the same amount of energy.
    While the 230 is heavier and will travel slower, the 200 will travel faster. This results in near equal muzzle and downrange energy, also equal felt recoil.

    As stated before, not much difference, other than point of impact relative to point of aim.

    Exactly!^^^
    And even so, I would guess anyone (short of a new shooter or very small person) could tell any difference in recoil between the two when shooting.
     

    Andy

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 13, 2013
    922
    21
    Dallas, TX
    I cast both styles.

    With that said, it depends what you're concerned about - accuracy, reliability, powder or lead.

    Accuracy - in my 1911, the 200gr seems more accurate than the 230gr when bench-rested at 25 yards, but it's a work in progress and I'm loathe to say this definitively yet.

    Reliability - while I love the 200gr SWC (H&G #68 as well as a Mihec clone), they don't feed well in all pistols - so if you want a "no muss, no fuss" bullet that will feed in almost anything, get the 230gr RN.

    Powder or lead - A heavier bullet uses less powder. However, heavier bullets cost a little bit more - or if you cast your own bullets like me, they dig into your lead stash a bit more. For example, a pound of lead gets me 35 of the 200gr bullets - that same pound of lead only gets me 30 230gr bullets. So - are you more concerned with the cost/availability of gunpowder or the cost/availability of lead? :)

    Recoil has been mentioned by competitive shooters - Rob Leatham, for example, prefers heavier bullets - he says that they recoil less. Damned if I know - feels the same to me *shrug*
     
    Last edited:

    Dawico

    Uncoiled
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Oct 15, 2009
    36,622
    96
    Lampasas, Texas
    I agree with the fact that 230 gr rn bullets feed extremely well.

    Technically lighter bullets have more recoil but in standard pistol rounds you may not notice.
     

    deemus

    my mama says I'm special
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Feb 1, 2010
    12,278
    96
    DFW
    I prefer the 230's in my 45 ACP. I like how they feed and the recoil is manageable.
     

    rushthezeppelin

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Dec 28, 2012
    3,821
    31
    Cedar Park
    Depends on how recoil sensitive you are. 230 gr is going to recoil more than 200 gr. For ever action there's an equal and opposite reaction... larger mass to move = more recoil towards you.

    sent from deep space

    Tell that to my 150gr SWCs I use in my 9mm, they think they are 22 magnums :P Velocity and burn rate of your powder has just as much to do with recoil as bullet weight, if not more.
     
    Top Bottom