IBTL Just subscribing so I can watch the posts. This subject has been beaten probably only about a clik or two less than the BOS thingy.
IBTL Just subscribing so I can watch the posts. This subject has been beaten probably only about a clik or two less than the BOS thingy.
Unless it is a Post Office parking lot.
Federal...............
Unless it is a Post Office parking lot.
Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment, nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on the longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms
In sum, the Second Amendment does not secure any individual’s fundamental “right to bear arms” when they are occupying either a federal facility or postal property, where regulations banning the possession, carrying and storing of firearms on the premises are properly noticed
The fact that there have not been a number of cases on this point shows that the great number of concealed carry licensees who stop at post offices carry discretely and do not create problems. This is significant. When concealed carry was first proposed, and every improvement since, we were told there would be blood in the streets and citizens being terrified by licensees brandishing guns. These threats are still heard, are always wrong, but are treated as valid commentary by the media. The shortage of post office cases indicates the efforts of concealed carry licensees to carry lawfully and discreetly; yet, it happens.
Post Office property is specifically off limits. Generally carry on Federal property is lawful, just not inside Federal facilities.
And 30.06 is irrelevant.Unless it is a Post Office parking lot.