Weighted with the pure scientific awesomeness that is .30scThe testing that I’ve seen has been very ammo company “weighted’’.
<>Weighted with the pure scientific awesomeness that is .30sc
Your loss. I don't know what 'science' you subscribe to, but i can say after much consultation with many wise men, some of whom sit on hills and mountains all day, we came to the conclusion that .30sc is best<>
Having read thousands of scientific reports and hundreds of ballistics tests; the ones I saw were not properly designed, controlled, or analyzed.
Yet they all agreed that .30SC was not significantly better than some more readily avilable .380 (9mmK) loads.
I don’t disagree with that conclusion, so I quit looking at the available .30SC’s.
<>
Holy Christ, I can't believe I just went through another 4-1/2 pages of this shit!The answer is simply "it depends"
Holy Christ, I can't believe I just went through another 4-1/2 pages of this shit!
The only thing noteworthy was from Sasquatch...
Just not sure how to interpret it yet.
Do you have to be pre-Depends stage of life, or post Depends to believe in .30SC ?
I always thought it had something to do with Pampers...
<>Your loss. I don't know what 'science' you subscribe to, but i can say after much consultation with many wise men, some of whom sit on hills and mountains all day, we came to the conclusion that .30sc is best
<>
OK, Zack, time to dish: How many .30SC’s do you have and show pics !
<<>
<>
It was originally a serious question, as I contemplated buying .380’s for young Women in my Family, and wondered if the .30SC was even worth a ‘’look-at.‘’
Someone began this thread as a parody, and it ‘’caught fire’’.
leVieux
<>
I take it that you are a Pampers type...It's your choice to come back. And really, if you're still here after the past 67 pages, thats on you
Nevertheless i thank you for your contribution.
I take it that you are a Pampers type...