People always say in Texas every homicide goes to the GJ, but I can't figure out whether this is actually true. Nothing in the CCP that is relevant, unless I missed it.
Is this yet another myth? Or if true, where in the code should I be looking?
Who ruled them justified?I know of homicides that were never taken to a GJ due to them being ruled justifiable. I dont think there is any legal requirement that a GJ hear them.
Ah, but the question was are all homicides refered to a GJ. Whether or not an offense was committed, a homicide was committed.Totally agree with you but what you are referring to is when there has been a determination made there was no offense committed
part of a DA's duty (and discretion - read the link i posted - its quite clear) is to determine what cases merit prosecution - and which ones dont
DA's make decisions to take - or not take - cases to trial - ALL THE TIME
there are a handful of good reasons i could come up with that a DA wouldnt take a justifiable homicide before a grand jury'
and just as many why they would
The AG opinion you posted confirms what we already knew, which is that normally DAs have discretion regarding taking felonies to the GJ. I was looking for something in writing which states that DAs must take all homicides to a GJ. I am now satisfied that no such document exists, and the "all homicides in Texas to go a grand jury" idea is just another popular myth.if you know how to read and interpret an opinion - its not worthless at all
you were looking for something in writing
I neither like nor dislike you, because we've never met.if you dont like the deliverer of the message, thats your problem
The Assistant DA takes the fact to a GJ and offer the GJ several Penal Code offenses that they can indict on. For instance, man beats woman with a pipe. Da says these are the facts....you can indict for Attempted Murder or Agg. Assault. GJ will decide what charge (with DA guidance).How do you go before a grand jury without charges?