I hope he didn't get it from a tan guy doing his laundry at the gym.He probably used a BOS when he sold the gun!
Cause they bout to be tred upon.
I hope he didn't get it from a tan guy doing his laundry at the gym.He probably used a BOS when he sold the gun!
LolHe probably used a BOS when he sold the gun!
I hope he didn't get it from a tan guy doing his laundry at the gym.
Cause they bout to be tred upon.
I hope he didn't get it from a tan guy doing his laundry at the gym.
Cause they bout to be tred upon.
Another crime that shouldn’t be a crime. Either he paid his debt to society or not. If he’s free, he should have all the rights of a free man.Feds charge gun seller. He was a prohibited person to begin with. Felon in possession.
I wonder if they will go after who sold him the gun.
Colleyville synagogue standoff: Man who allegedly sold gun to suspect charged by feds
Henry "Michael" Williams was charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm after authorities say he sold the weapon that Maisal Akram used to hold a rabbi and three others hostage for hours.www.fox4news.com
He hasn’t finished paying his debt to society. Part of his punishment is never being able to have a firearm again. He may be free from incarceration, but not from the balance of his punishment.Another crime that shouldn’t be a crime. Either he paid his debt to society or not. If he’s free, he should have all the rights of a free man.
The Right to self defense should only be taken away when incarcerated. If he has been released it should be because he has paid his dues and is restored. Does he lose his 1st Amendment rights? If not, then why his 2nd?He hasn’t finished paying his debt to society. Part of his punishment is never being able to have a firearm again. He may be free from incarceration, but not from the balance of his punishment.
"Federal firearm laws are designed to keep guns from falling into dangerous hands. As a convicted felon, Mr. Williams was prohibited from carrying, acquiring, or selling firearms. Whether or not he knew of his buyer’s nefarious intent is largely irrelevant — felons cannot have guns, period, and the Justice Department is committed to prosecuting those who do," said U.S. Attorney Chad E. Meacham in a statement.
It’s part of the punishment. You want the Constitution to be a living document also? You don’t like it, work to change the law. I don’t give a damn about what you “ feel “ should happen.Until the law is changed .Then I I will abide by it.The Right to self defense should only be taken away when incarcerated. If he has been released it should be because he has paid his dues and is restored. Does he lose his 1st Amendment rights? If not, then why his 2nd?
Yes, they certainly deserve to be treated fairly.
I wish one of the well-armed and trained was in that building.
I can't understand any Jewish person/family not being armed and ready all day, every day.
Half the world has tried to eradicate them.
It’s part of the punishment. You want the Constitution to be a living document also? You don’t like it, work to change the law. I don’t give a damn about what you “ feel “ should happen.Until the law is changed .Then I I will abide by it.
Once they have served their time either in prison or on probation, that should be the end of it and their 2nd Amendment rights restored. No one should be punished for life, unless they are serving it in prison. People make stupid mistakes, and some of them are even criminal, but people deserve a second chance, and deserve the right to defend themselves just like anyone else, yourself included.Laws have changed since 1968. Doesn’t mean they are unconstitutional. Felons can’t possess a firearm. Blood alcohol for a DWI has gone from .2 to .08. Neither of them has been declared unconstitutional.I haven’t meet a person that didn’t know that if were convicted of a felony that you lost your right to own or carry a gun. Do a crime and suffer the consequences.The laws are very clear.
Just because a Court has not said they are un-Constitutional does not mean they are Constitutional. It just means it has not been brought before them or they decided not to hear the case.Laws have changed since 1968. Doesn’t mean they are unconstitutional. Felons can’t possess a firearm. Blood alcohol for a DWI has gone from .2 to .08. Neither of them has been declared unconstitutional.I haven’t meet a person that didn’t know that if were convicted of a felony that you lost your right to own or carry a gun. Do a crime and suffer the consequences.The laws are very clear.
To be fair, not taking a side just an observation, driving is not an enumerated right. There is, or should be, a much higher bar to effect such enumerated rights. Not the same as the rules of the road.Laws have changed since 1968. Doesn’t mean they are unconstitutional. Felons can’t possess a firearm. Blood alcohol for a DWI has gone from .2 to .08. Neither of them has been declared unconstitutional.I haven’t meet a person that didn’t know that if were convicted of a felony that you lost your right to own or carry a gun. Do a crime and suffer the consequences.The laws are very clear.