GOA is worth supporting

Discussion in 'News Articles' started by Hawghauler, Dec 17, 2009.

  1. Hawghauler

    Hawghauler Active Member

    638
    0
    36
    Oct 5, 2009
    Idaho
    GOA and GOF File Brief in Chicago Handgun Ban Case

    Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
    8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
    Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
    http://www.gunowners.org


    Wednesday, December 16, 2009

    On Monday, November 23, 2009, Gun Owners of America and Gun Owners Foundation filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the United States Supreme Court in support of four Chicago residents seeking to invalidate a city ordinance prohibiting them from owning or possessing a handgun in their own home.

    Just one year and ninth months previously, GOA and GOF filed a similar brief in support of a Washington, D.C. resident who was seeking relief from an almost identical city ordinance.

    On June 26, 2008, in District of Columbia v. Heller, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the D.C. ordinance was unconstitutional because an absolute ban on handgun ownership and possession "infringed" on the D.C. citizen's right to keep and bear arms as secured by the Second Amendment.

    "The question now before the Court is whether an American citizen who resides in Chicago, Illinois has the same right to keep or bear arms as the American citizen who resides in the District of Columbia," said GOA Executive Director Larry Pratt.

    "Since both residents are American citizens, it seems logical that both ought to have the same rights," Pratt said.

    According to Heller, the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms belongs to "all Americans." The current GOA brief, which is supported by seven other like-minded organizations, contends that this right extends to every American citizen without regard to state of residence.

    That argument is based on the Fourteenth Amendment's straightforward prohibition against any state that makes or enforces any law that "abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States."

    By relying expressly on this "privileges and immunities" clause, the GOA brief urges the Court not to use a gun rights case to extend the power of the federal judiciary to impose its predilections upon the states in unrelated areas, such as business regulation and moral license.

    Gun Owners of America and Gun Owners Foundation usually take the side that is against the federal government because it has become too big for its britches. And the Chicago case is no exception from that policy and principle.

    Thus, it bears repeating that the Supreme Court found in Heller that the very purpose of the unalienable right to keep and bear arms is to prevent "tyrants" from "taking away the people's arms, enabling a select militia or standing army to suppress political opponents." To the Court's credit, it saw that the D.C. ban on handguns was just the kind of regulation prohibited by the Second Amendment. Thus, the Court ruled that the keeping of handguns for self-defense was a "central component of the right itself."

    Another successful outcome of GOA's Heller brief was in countering the Bush Administration, which had asked the Court to use the D.C. case as a justification for all sorts of gun control. GOA was pleased that the Justices heeded our admonition to limit the Court's holding to the case before it, thus shooting down both the D.C. government and the Bush Administration in their quest to validate other firearms restrictions.

    A brief like the one we are filing regarding the Chicago case is very expensive. We constantly hear from gun owners that we need to be challenging gun bans in court, to counter the efforts of the Brady Bunch, the ACLU and other leftist organizations.

    So won't you please join us in this monumental battle with a special year-end contribution to help pay our expenses for this important effort?

    (I took out the donation link)
     


  2. jgedmond

    jgedmond Active Member

    240
    0
    16
    Dec 2, 2008
    Spring
    There are several good 2nd Amendment organizations out there to support. Pick 2 or 3 organizations and support them via donations of money and / or time as your circumstances allow. IMO, everyone should belong to the NRA first because they are the big dogs at the federal lobbying / oversight level (and other things).

    I need to research the GOA, but after a quick look at their website, it looks like they definitely deserve my support as well.

    In addition to the NRA, I chose to support the Second Amendment Foundation after hearing about them on Gun Talk. These guys brought this McDonald case to the Supreme Court along with Alan Gura. They have a long-term legal strategy to challenge gun control laws at the national, sate and local levels. Lifetime membership was only $150 and I signed up for that the next day after doing some research on them.

    BTW, you can follow the legal aspects of the McDonald case at:

    ChicagoGunCase.com

    Latest update: The case will be argued Tuesday, March 2, 2010 at 10:00 a.m.

    Apologize if this is too off topic.
     
  3. DCortez

    DCortez TGT Addict

    6,612
    0
    36
    Jan 28, 2009
    Houston, Cy-Fair

    I would agree. We support the NRA, TSRA, and of course this forum.
     
  4. Hawghauler

    Hawghauler Active Member

    638
    0
    36
    Oct 5, 2009
    Idaho
    I am a third generation NRA supporter. I also support GOA because they are extremely good a keeping you informed on upcoming legislation and let you know who, what, and where to focus your calls, letters, emails, and of course $$$. Reminds me, I'll have to make sure mama is maintaining our memberships to both.
     
  5. Nestromo

    Nestromo Member

    82
    0
    16
    Feb 19, 2009
    Watauga, TX
    I recently joined GOA after an irritating phone call to the NRA. I was going to give them money (which I do whenever I can spare) but I gave it to GOA instead.
     

Share This Page