I'm actually thinking about going with the Trijicon 1x4. I like the fiber optic and the simple reticle.
I do plan on using it almost exclusively for hunting.
Holy crap, you can go with like three of the other two for the price of the Swarovski.
IMO, Accupoint. It's a great price for the quality you get, agree on the uncluttered reticle and I like not having to worry at all about batteries or messing with a switch. It's up, it's on target, it's a hit.
I've got a 1-4x24 Accupoint on my AR. Can't say anything bad about it, especially for the price I got on it.
I had a Trijicon ACOG, and am partial to Trijicon, but i wouldnt be adverse to plopping down money on a Swaro, honestly. Part of it is status, part is quality.
Quality is hard to explain honestly. Its just something about where its made...
I had a Trijicon ACOG, and am partial to Trijicon, but i wouldnt be adverse to plopping down money on a Swaro, honestly. Part of it is status, part is quality.
Quality is hard to explain honestly. Its just something about where its made...
Quality is hard to explain, but almost never has anything to do with where something is made. The end result is all that's important. China could start exporting stuff that's as good as Swarovski.
Swaro is top of the line I have 3 and they are super.
Have a conquest and they are optically close to swaros.
Never had a trijicon but hear they are good.
If money is no object, go swaro.
But any are great products.