Lynx Defense

Is there any hope if we remain "One Nation"?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Younggun

    Certified Jackass
    TGT Supporter
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jul 31, 2011
    53,800
    96
    hill co.
    So, I've been thinking about this crap a lot, and browsing a ton of other political forums on TT. I can't help but feel like there probably isn't much hope of pulling this nation back together.

    On one side you have conservatives. They want "small" government, stricter immigration laws(current laws enforced), the gov out of their business, and a fair amount of freedom so long as it fits their moral compass. They don't believe people have the ability to be good without the presence of religion and think god is necessary for society to advance in a positive manner. They believe the left has been brainwashed by big government, hand outs, and the MSM. (all generalities)

    On the other side you have Liberals. Basically gunning for socialism, although I don't think all of them realize that their plans lead to that end, and eventually full blown communism. I also include in this group an fair number who have the goal of full blown communism. They don't believe they can protect themselves not do they trust their fellow man to not murder them given the tools for self defense. They truly believe that the right has been brainwashed by the gov, big business, and MSM (again, generalities)

    Then their are the Libertarians. They are an extremely fractured group. Many claiming the title but only supporting certain ideals of libertarianism. Some have a decidedly leftist take, others very conservative morals. Just do a little googling on libertarianism and you will see why I'm not going to hammer out all the differing sects that have taken the title in the past 100 years or so. Libertarians tend to be stuck in the middle, but the number of modern libertarians seems to have grown at a fast pace in the US over the past decade, although with little agreement on the actual stance of any libertarian party.

    Concentrating on the first two groups (the third tending to fall on one side or the other the majority of the time), the is NO agreement at this point. The Left is looking to take more and more from those who earn in order to fund social welfare programs. There are generations who know nothing other than social welfare and believe that they truly are entitled to it. The numbers have risen to the degree that they form a massive voting block. The right is attempting to combat this (the people, not the politicians) by looking for super conservative candidates. In some areas this is good, but it also makes it more difficult to appeal to large sects of the population. Many groups who don't support the socialist agenda will still vote for the path based on a single issue (conservative gays). It makes for a very tough fight on a national scale.

    Add in the relative disdain that many on both sides of the isle have for the current state of our government in general and things really look bad. And while complaining that congress can get nothing done and agree on nothing we have a population that is in the same state. Any compromise from either side is generally met with utter disgust. The left is digging in their heels to "end their oppression" while the right is digging in their heels to end the constant chipping away at their rights and livelihood.



    It has been mentioned that voting rights should be restricted. That could possibly give the right the upper hand, but I think it has about a snowballs chance in hell of passing. Then there would be the court battles over constitutionality, and finding a way to navigate that process would probably have about a snowflakes chance in hell. Say it all did pass, would the nation survive the fracture it would cause? Rioting on a scale never before seen, very likely erupting in to an even bigger "dispute".


    At this point, I don't know that there really is an answer for this nation. A fundamental change in the way people think, but is that feasible? Not sure if there is really any way that this country can survive as one free nation.


    Can't help but wonder what the USA will look like when my kids grow and and start trying to raise their own families.


    /rambling
     

    AustinN4

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Nov 27, 2013
    9,853
    96
    Austin
    So, I've been thinking about this crap a lot, and browsing a ton of other political forums on TT. I can't help but feel like there probably isn't much hope of pulling this nation back together.

    On one side you have conservatives. They want "small" government, stricter immigration laws(current laws enforced), the gov out of their business, and a fair amount of freedom so long as it fits their moral compass. They don't believe people have the ability to be good without the presence of religion and think god is necessary for society to advance in a positive manner. They believe the left has been brainwashed by big government, hand outs, and the MSM. (all generalities)

    On the other side you have Liberals. Basically gunning for socialism, although I don't think all of them realize that their plans lead to that end, and eventually full blown communism. I also include in this group an fair number who have the goal of full blown communism. They don't believe they can protect themselves not do they trust their fellow man to not murder them given the tools for self defense. They truly believe that the right has been brainwashed by the gov, big business, and MSM (again, generalities)

    Then their are the Libertarians. They are an extremely fractured group. Many claiming the title but only supporting certain ideals of libertarianism. Some have a decidedly leftist take, others very conservative morals. Just do a little googling on libertarianism and you will see why I'm not going to hammer out all the differing sects that have taken the title in the past 100 years or so. Libertarians tend to be stuck in the middle, but the number of modern libertarians seems to have grown at a fast pace in the US over the past decade, although with little agreement on the actual stance of any libertarian party.

    Concentrating on the first two groups (the third tending to fall on one side or the other the majority of the time), the is NO agreement at this point. The Left is looking to take more and more from those who earn in order to fund social welfare programs. There are generations who know nothing other than social welfare and believe that they truly are entitled to it. The numbers have risen to the degree that they form a massive voting block. The right is attempting to combat this (the people, not the politicians) by looking for super conservative candidates. In some areas this is good, but it also makes it more difficult to appeal to large sects of the population. Many groups who don't support the socialist agenda will still vote for the path based on a single issue (conservative gays). It makes for a very tough fight on a national scale.

    Add in the relative disdain that many on both sides of the isle have for the current state of our government in general and things really look bad. And while complaining that congress can get nothing done and agree on nothing we have a population that is in the same state. Any compromise from either side is generally met with utter disgust. The left is digging in their heels to "end their oppression" while the right is digging in their heels to end the constant chipping away at their rights and livelihood.



    It has been mentioned that voting rights should be restricted. That could possibly give the right the upper hand, but I think it has about a snowballs chance in hell of passing. Then there would be the court battles over constitutionality, and finding a way to navigate that process would probably have about a snowflakes chance in hell. Say it all did pass, would the nation survive the fracture it would cause? Rioting on a scale never before seen, very likely erupting in to an even bigger "dispute".


    At this point, I don't know that there really is an answer for this nation. A fundamental change in the way people think, but is that feasible? Not sure if there is really any way that this country can survive as one free nation.


    Can't help but wonder what the USA will look like when my kids grow and and start trying to raise their own families. /rambling
    And, with those happy thoughts, I think I'll go get a beer.
     

    oldguy

    Well-Known
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 6, 2008
    1,891
    46
    Unless we change liberal public schools and universities at some point we will break apart as the old Soviet union, liberalism is like a cancer it spreads and kills.
     

    Younggun

    Certified Jackass
    TGT Supporter
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jul 31, 2011
    53,800
    96
    hill co.

    Southpaw

    Forum BSer
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Mar 30, 2009
    17,911
    96
    Guadalupe Co.
    So, I've been thinking about this crap a lot, and browsing a ton of other political forums on TT. I can't help but feel like there probably isn't much hope of pulling this nation back together.

    On one side you have conservatives. They want "small" government, stricter immigration laws(current laws enforced), the gov out of their business, and a fair amount of freedom so long as it fits their moral compass. They don't believe people have the ability to be good without the presence of religion and think god is necessary for society to advance in a positive manner. They believe the left has been brainwashed by big government, hand outs, and the MSM. (all generalities)

    ............


    /rambling

    Great post YG. But the one thing that stuck out to me (in bold) I have been thinking about lately as well. Sometimes I regretfully feel that if all sides were drawn, one of the sides I might need to defend against would be those that think this way, though I myself have no issue with them and would most likely support them in their overall efforts if they thought they could allow for others who do not necessary practice their religious regimen. I don't say that with malice, but it is a real concern sometimes.
     

    winchster

    Right Wing Extremist
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Nov 7, 2010
    4,295
    31
    Justin, TX
    The confederacy had it right, on states-rights. We lost that war. I have a feeling that we shall see version 2.0 within my lifetime, and I believe we will win the second one. Now, does that mean the death of the United States? In it's current form, yes. I believe the slide into oblivion began with the ending of the last civil war, and has accelerated since. I believe, the founding fathers, were a firm believer in limited federal government and those things not specified to the fed were to be left to the states. I just hope it happens soon enough for me to be able to help make a difference.
     

    Sapper740

    TGT Addict
    BANNED!!!
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 21, 2013
    2,855
    21
    I'd hate if the United States fractured into two or three entities. Too much blood has been spilled to make this country what it is (was?) and I'm not ready to give up on it yet. Having said that, if it does splinter, I hope Texas goes it's own way and soon before Obama's Surge turns us into Nuevo Tejas.
     

    Mikeinhistory

    Well-Known
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Feb 19, 2013
    1,141
    31
    Austin, TX
    The United States was not founded so that people could get along or agree. It was founded and the Constitution adopted as a form of guarantee that the average person would be left the opportunity to progress, especially in economic sense. In the strictest sense, ideology should be able change to anything and society as well, but the rule of law should still be applicable to all. This was the real reason for the "Revolution". No one wanted to live at the whim of a tyrant, wether that be the king or a landlord. This country would be fine if people could look past their own ideologies and realize that protecting the rights of others and affording them rights does not ever weaken their own rights, even if ideologically or morally they do not support those rights. The two things that have driven America forward from the very beginning have been economic and social progress. And a big part of making that possible has been the at least somewhat real possibility of gaining economic and social advancement by the most average citizen.
     

    Younggun

    Certified Jackass
    TGT Supporter
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jul 31, 2011
    53,800
    96
    hill co.
    Great post YG. But the one thing that stuck out to me (in bold) I have been thinking about lately as well. Sometimes I regretfully feel that if all sides were drawn, one of the sides I might need to defend against would be those that think this way, though I myself have no issue with them and would most likely support them in their overall efforts if they thought they could allow for others who do not necessary practice their religious regimen. I don't say that with malice, but it is a real concern sometimes.

    I've dealt with the same.
     

    breakingcontact

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Oct 16, 2012
    18,298
    31
    Indianapolis
    I've dealt with the same.

    I wish you libertarians who go ahead and take over the GOP or get your LP to be relevant.

    Then maybe we could see what libertarians are about when they are in control instead of just hearing all of their "ideas" about how things could be.

    I am allied with libertarians on many fronts. This ongoing beef with religious conservatives plays to the advantage of which group exactly?

    We have a broad coalition that could take over if we would campaign for, fund and vote for good candidates.
     

    Younggun

    Certified Jackass
    TGT Supporter
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jul 31, 2011
    53,800
    96
    hill co.
    I wish you libertarians who go ahead and take over the GOP or get your LP to be relevant.

    Then maybe we could see what libertarians are about when they are in control instead of just hearing all of their "ideas" about how things could be.

    I am allied with libertarians on many fronts. This ongoing beef with religious conservatives plays to the advantage of which group exactly?

    We have a broad coalition that could take over if we would campaign for, fund and vote for good candidates.

    It's not really a beef, just disagreements.

    I'm also aligned with conservatives on many fronts. I have conservative values and raise my children based on them.

    I think you have taken southpaws comment and my agreement in a different light than it was intended.

    Imagine S does HTF. You have referenced the possibilities of different forms if gov taking hold. For many, that includes the possibility of a heavily religious gov that bases rights and freedoms around religion, including which ones would be OK to practice.

    You have said in the past the you believed a day would come when it would be libertarians Vs conservatives. As a libertarian I have never advocated such a thing until recently during a discussion over voting rights.

    The idea of fighting to keep our freedoms and aligning with a group that may be willing to restrict other freedoms is somewhat troubling for some.

    I hope that clears things up a little. Long posts are difficult on the phone so I will probably have to clarify parts of this post later.
     

    Vaquero

    Moving stuff to the gas prices thread.....
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Apr 4, 2011
    44,414
    96
    Dixie Land
    I fear we shall enter a time of bloodshed by factions. Much like the middle east. Sunni, shiite, gov loyalists, etc.

    I want no part of it.
     
    Top Bottom