Just shows hypocrisy knows no limits with the Democrats or Biden.Things I learned today:
Joe Biden threatened to filibuster a black female nominee for the Supreme Court if Bush nominated her. And he did this on national television - CBS's "Face the Nation".
Judge Janice Rogers Brown was being considered to replace Judge Sandra Day O'Connor when this happened.
She strikes me as someone that wants to set forth policy via the SC rather than laws set forth by Congress.SCOTUS was given a mission many many years ago: To decide the CONSTITUTIONALITY of a given question, action, law. That was their job and it was Job 1.
IN fact, there should NO Republicans or Democrats on the bench at all, you should be a true Constitutionalist, neither Left nor Right but a strict Constitutionalist! This gal was ONLY nominated because she was Black and a Harvard Law School Grad. That said her COLOR ASIDE, lets look at her track record: Thin to say the least. Undergrad degree in Arts, did not Grad from Law School until '96. Look at her resume and you got to ask, can this gal even hold down a job, she bounced all over the place. At age 52 she has a lifetime track record of very little and very little success. In fact she does not have the creds to come before SCOTUS as a lawyer and they want to put her on the bench...GMAFB! View attachment 311460
FACT: She lacks the background and decision capability to set on the bench at the SCOTUS level.
Also, a bit on the young side meaning she lacks life experience.
I would ask one question ONLY: Ms, on the 2nd Amendment Specifically what exactly does the following mean to you, our Constitution and "We the People", "shall not be infringed"?
In my thinking their ruling should be: Yes or No, Yes its within the Constitution or No its not. Then let the lower courts decide the implementation or not of the proposed law or the law.She strikes me as someone that wants to set forth policy via the SC rather than laws set forth by Congress.
SC justices are suppose to decide a case based on how it coincides with the Constitution and the Bill or Rights, and how not to infringe upon those rights.
Sometimes, really smart people really ain't that smart. They too many times like to over-complicate things when they don't need to be!In my thinking their ruling should be: Yes or No, Yes its within the Constitution or No its not. Then let the lower courts decide the implementation or not of the proposed law or the law.
Agreed!The irony is that Ted Cruz is head and shoulders, eons, centuries more qualified to be in the SCOTUS than this clone of Kamala Harris.
She says she doesn't know about CRT, but sits on a school board that the school pushes this nonsense.
Regardless of the questions, or her answers, there is a high probability she will get confirmed.Looks like this idiot is closer to being confirmed. Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) has stated she will cross the aisle and support this poor excuse of a nominee. Absolutely no surprise that it was Collins, who along with Mittens and Murkowski, are the most leftist RINOs in the Senate.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political...ort-judge-ketanji-brown-jackson-supreme-court
WHY NOT, she meets the ONLY 2 requirements: Black and a Woman (giving her fair credit for being a woman even tho she does NOT know what a woman is????Regardless of the questions, or her answers, there is a high probability she will get confirmed.
I'm thinking by using those qualifiers for such positions, Biden thinks it will give him a free pass on all of his past racism and racist remarks.WHY NOT, she meets the ONLY 2 requirements: Black and a Woman (giving her fair credit for being a woman even tho she does NOT know what a woman is????