Over 60 turn in your guns

Status

Twincannons

New Member
Mar 9, 2008
48
6
North Texas
Guns to Be Banned for Elderly
Staff Reports, UPI
Washington

Deputy Attorney General Designate David Ogden is circulating a draft of an executive order in which, among other things, firearms possession would be severely limited to people over age 60.

An assistant toOgdentold us, "It appears that in these changing times, it is no longer necessary to allow the elderly to be armed. With all of their physical ailments and increasing senility, to leave them in control of a deadly weapon would be ludicrous."

While the Executive Order may sound too powerful, experts in Constitutional law state that it is not actually un-Constitutional.

"It's a question of wording." states Columbia Law Professor, Dr. John Braxton. "The Constitution forbids the Congress, that is, the legislative branch, from passing any laws infringing on gun ownership. The executive branch is not included in this proviso. As long as the Congress doesn't get involved, it's technically a non-issue."

The Justice Departmentwas tossing the idea of a gun ban for seniors during the Carter and Clinton Administration, but public opinion stopped these initiatives. Now, the Obama White House believes differently.

An unnamed aide close toOgdenagreed to talk on the condition of anonymity.

"Clinton and Carter didn't have as much of a mandate as President Obama. They were both Southerners, and the Second Amendment was sacrosanct to their constituents. However, President Obama comes from a new sort of politics, where divisive issues like firearms do not apply to him."

"Quite frankly, it's a shame that no one has had the good conscience to have done this already. It's a simple process, and the majority of the American people will understand it and follow the law."

The enforcement mechanism for this particular executive order has not been published. It is likely that the confiscation of weapons will be similar toGreat Britain's handgun ban, in which citizens willingly gave the weapons to police.

It is expected that the executive order will be given around July 1, when senior-related gun deaths reach their peaks.

The aide toOgdenstated: "For eight years you see the rolling back of regulation, and crime has skyrocketed. In fact, inMassachusettsalone, murders have risen 50% since 2002. Armed robbery has also risen dramatically. With such circumstances, we must act boldly."


Folks, I can't help but ask, "How much of this crime was committed by people over 60?" And how much ofthis crime was committed on people over 60 who are unarmed? And, how many peace officers will have to retire because they are over 60? Where is the END to this insanity?
 
I'll be 77 next month, and can still do the "El Presidente" in less thanten seconds.

I wouldn't object to being tested for proficiency & safe firearm handling every year or so, in lieu of the proposed Executive Order.

An arbitrary age limit is 'bad think'; having said that, we have to admit that some individuals in their 70s, or 60s, or 50s, etc should probably not be allowed to posess firearms, knives, baseball bats, hatchets, automobiles. etc, etc.

What does such a ruling lead to/ And where does it end? I fear Incrementalism; but what do I know, at my age?
 

JKTex

Well-Known
Mar 11, 2008
2,018
38
DFW, North Texas
Guys, it ain't real..........

Well, I think it's real, sort of. Real, but not what it says, and made to sound like something it's not. You know, another one of those foil hat, the sky is falling gimmick's that people keep falling for.

I saw it come up on another forum but the article actually had a bill referenced, but that was misinterpreted and to boot, there's already law prohibiting what the story claims.

If that doesn't make sense, lets just stick with, "Guys, it ain't real......"
 

Pappy

Resident Septuagenarian
Feb 29, 2008
319
16
Texas
I'm 73 and no one is taking my guns....period!!!!!

Isn't this profiling???
 
Status
Top Bottom