The 30.06 sign I would remain intact, the only change is that it wouldn't have force of law. No sign would.I personally like the 30.06 code. It may need some tweaks, but it is very specific for a reason. Much better than just any old gunbuster sign.
I disagree with you about the reason for the support, this ball was started rolling long before OCT. However, if they want to claim sole credit for it being brought up, then they need to claim sole credit for killing it as well.
This.
You are misrepresenting what I said. I very specifically referred to the amount of support OC has had this session. I'm not discounting the work that others put in. I'm acknowledging the impact that long gun open carry walks have had.I disagree and not sure how you can come to that conclusion. When you say that is the "only" reason, you are discounting all the work others have done for years to get us to this point. Most of that work has been done quietly and respectfully.
Do you remember how much support open carry had last session? Were you apart of the open carry movement? I remember. I've been a part of the movement for quite a while.
I remember how little support there was for open carry and how no one was proposing constitutional carry.
Suddenly have the Senate is supporting open carry in some form or other and there is real discussion about it.