They don't see it because it doesn't happen. You're comparing the speed of a falling building to the speed of lightweight debris and dust falling through the air in those videos.
It collapsed because almost half the building was destroyed by a bunch of one of the towers falling on it. And then it burned. Ya think that having one of the world's largest buildings falling on top of it followed by an uncontrolled fire might cause something bad to happen? Hmmmm?
Straight-up bullshit claim. I can name an example from memory, and another fell into my lap with a Google search.
Calif. road collapses after tanker fire - U.S. news - Life - msnbc.com
http://michiganfireservice.com/tanker-fire-causes-collapse-of-overpass/381/
Steel beams in those overpasses. Tankers full of fuel burned under them, causing the steel to fail and the structures to collapse.
One other factor in the towers' collapse may have been the fact that each had a jetliner weighing nearly a quarter million pounds slammed into it at 500 or so miles an hour.
That's right. A quarter million pounds. You load a 757 up with passengers, their shit and enough fuel to fly coast to coast (why do you think these flights were chosen!?) and they're heavy as hell.
Let's calculate the impact energy of one of these planes. Let's assume they didn't take off at close to MTOW. Let's say they both weighed 200,000 lbs at impact. Let's also say they weren't moving that fast (they were fully capable of 600 MPH, stall is around 225, so they had to be going faster than that - flaps were up and controls get mushy as you approach stall speed). So we'll go 400 MPH. The impact energy is 1,069,700,000 ft lbs force.
That's right, a billion fucking foot pounds. Do you think that might contribute to a structural failure!?
As noted before, 757. But yes... there were parts everywhere. There were parts inside the building. Why wasn't the hole that big? Unlike the towers, the Pentagon is hardened. It's made of thick reinforced concrete. Know what a 757 is made of? Aluminum and plastic for the most part. It's big, heavy and moving fast, but it's essentially a beer can.
Yet somehow most of the articles written by people who know what they're talking about debunk these wild-assed theories that someone could somehow pull off what has to be the biggest, most complicated op in history without anybody talking or noticing.
The fact that you rely on the "controlled implosion theory" tells me how little you've learned from those articles. Taking something the size of a house down would require several notebook pages worth of calculation of charge size and placement. Just using demo to open a door requires more math than most people not trained realize.
When did work crews go in and pre-weaken the structure? How did people not notice that there were structural supports being taken out for months if not years before hand? How did they not notice the miles of wiring to the demo charges? How did they not notice walls being knocked out to place them? How did they not notice the heavy objects placed around charges for tamping? How did they not notice the army of workers needed to place all this stuff?
And where are the members of this army of people who murdered the equivalent of a small town? There aren't that many borderline sociopaths out there. It's been ten years. Someone somewhere would have got sick of the nightmares and come forward to blow the lid. Many someones, actually.
The funniest argument these idiots make when they try saying that it was demolition is that "byproducts of thermite" were found on site. Really? They found aluminum oxide and iron in the remains of a skyscraper!? No way! But that's not as retarded as they get. Thermite isn't really useful for cutting vertical supports. See, it burns and falls down as a super-hot liquid.
Ok, for future reference, this isn't the kind of thing that wins arguments. It's actually looked down upon for good reason. Google "Godwin's Law."
Beside the fact that it's pathetically predictable, this is an appeal to emotion, not part of a reasoned argument.
These people stuffing your head with this crap? They know as little about it as you do. They're not your friends. They're lying to you. They're using you to further an agenda.
Go do some serious research. Look at sources not involved in conspiracy or even counter-conspiracy.
For future reference, a Youtube video made by a couple of misanthropic pothead college students isn't exactly going to be chock full of accurate information.
... interesting that they showed everybody this "truth" by an organization willing to murder 3000 people, but they're still walking around, isn't it? Only explanation I can come up with for that is that they're dead wrong.
