Although this is from 2 years ago, it does go into what states can do constitutionally. I know, it's long, but it does give good insight and talks about Texas a lot. Of course, Aaron Reitz is on the panel, along with Chad Wolf and Ken Cuccinelli.
Although this is from 2 years ago, it does go into what states can do constitutionally. I know, it's long, but it does give good insight and talks about Texas a lot. Of course, Aaron Reitz is on the panel, along with Chad Wolf and Ken Cuccinelli.
I believe one or two of the cases were found in Texas's favor, it's just that nobody in the government enforces the rulings.Thanks for this. I just finished watching and listening carefully. It would be interesting to learn the outcome (or progress) of the six cases Reitz spoke of. At the end of the vid a link was mentioned at the Heritage Foundation about What States Could Do re Enforcing Immigration Law. I haven't read the link yet - but here it is. Again, thanks easy rider. Most appreciated.
Enforcing Immigration Law: What States Can Do To Assist the Federal Government and Fight the Illegal Immigration Problem
Illegal immigration is a growing problem that has many deleterious effects on states—from increasing costs for education, health care, and law enforcement to endangering residents who would otherwise not be victimized if criminal aliens were not in the country. While the federal government bears...www.heritage.org
While I don’t want illegal aliens in Texas, shipping them all over the country seems like a bad long term strategy. Intentional “Russification” isn’t going to play out like hot wheels thinks.Really?
Sending migrants to sanctuary cities in the north sure seems like standing up to the gov to me. As well as starting to enforce this law.
Disagree. I think it's a brilliant move and has actually had some positive impact.While I don’t want illegal aliens in Texas, shipping them all over the country seems like a bad long term strategy. Intentional “Russification” isn’t going to play out like hot wheels thinks.
Thank you.Disagree. I think it's a brilliant move and has actually had some positive impact.
And whatthefuckever calling the gov hot wheels. What a total douche move and way to rep that Christian flag in your avatar.
Well, that one is interesting I admit.Destruction of state property, the border fencing that Texas has installed.
Abbott is not stupid. This was never intended as a long term solution. It was intended to get people in Dem states aware of the impact of the issue (even if in a smaller way), so that they would put pressure on the Dem politicians. And it has been successful in doing such. Credit where credit is due.While I don’t want illegal aliens in Texas, shipping them all over the country seems like a bad long term strategy. Intentional “Russification” isn’t going to play out like hot wheels thinks.
This exactly!Abbott is not stupid. This was never intended as a long term solution. It was intended to get people in Dem states aware of the impact of the issue (even if in a smaller way), so that they would put pressure on the Dem politicians. And it has been successful in doing such. Credit where credit is due.
There is at least one small island in the river bed. Not sure how large it is, but the Cartels were using it. Think we evicted them.Isn't the Border Patrol Federal? US Border Patrol?
My understanding, is from the center of the Rio Grande to the river banks
belong to the federal government, but does it also (own) some of the land?
Well. No human knows how this will play out. I own a collection of dirt that some has been in my family for 135 years. The globalist freaks think they are sooo smart they can simply confiscate all the property in the world and make us eat bugs? I will meet them at my property line. We will see how that plays out. My neighbors feel the same way.Brexit is fait accompli, it's the cleanup from the aftermath that remains; a few ends to tie up in the post-Brexit agreements mostly regarding trade/tariffs/etc. That's the difficulty with extensive agreements, timelines, separation negotiations.
Texit is more relevant to this discussion. I, along with 619,000+ other Texans, am a member of the Texas Nationalist Movement - and see some of the same difficulties that the UK incurred... specifically that TNM feels a departure could be 'agreeably negotiated' with the US. Political and legislative efforts to put the vote to the people just to have a Referendum (not the secession vote itself) on returning to a Republic of Texas gains ground each year - and if nothing else keeps the issue at the fore.
I personally do not believe a Referendum will ever happen. That said, the organizational and preparational efforts undertaken by TNM in hopes of it happening do have a certain worth, imo, and why I support the organization: In the event of a later 'forced separation' (however that may evolve) a lot of the groundwork in returning to a Republic has already been done. Things are sliding sideways fast; who knows what's ahead. I dont.
The point is not missed that Texas leaving the US would go a long way in achieving the Globalists goal of breaking up the US...and frankly I'm surprised they're not promoting it. Or, perhaps they are, and this DOJ lawsuit is a match for the fire.
True dat.If nothing else, it's exposed hypocrisy
There is at least one small island in the river bed. Not sure how large it is, but the Cartels were using it. Think we evicted them.