I wont be happy until I can have this
Do they look better mounted in the bed of a Ford or a Chevy?.....
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
"or useth in wrath" is going to encompass pretty much anything.Timothy Cunningham’s important 1771 legal dictionary defined “arms” as “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another.
Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeit...
Although here we could argue that it being towed and mounted on a trailer, it just might fall outside the definition of arms one could "bear".
But seriously, on the subject of "military arms protected by the 2nd Amendment for ownership by civilians", lets not forget that in United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), counsel for the U.S. argued the NFA did not infringe upon the 2nd Amendment because the short-barreled shotgun was, in their opinion, NOT a weapon of a kind used by military or militia.
Everyone who values the 2A should read (and memorize much of) U.S. v Miller. That case was so incredibly weird in so many ways yet it set the huge precedent that federal gun control could be done without a scrap of logic and still be constitutional.But seriously, on the subject of "military arms protected by the 2nd Amendment for ownership by civilians", lets not forget that in United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), counsel for the U.S. argued the NFA did not infringe upon the 2nd Amendment because the short-barreled shotgun was, in their opinion, NOT a weapon of a kind used by military or militia.
Sure, take the fun out of it.A quad 50 requires the same paperwork as a M16. Actually more since there are four tax stamps involved.
Definitely! I waited 6 months for something that otherwise could have been done in 5 minutes.NFA was & IS plainly UNCONSTITUTIONAL on its face
If the 2nd Amendment applies only to muskets, then the 1st only applies to standing on a soap box in front of the town tavern and to carrier pigeons and parchment and quill, not to the high speed assault Internet developed by the military.
I think anyone trying to justify that the 2nd only applies to muskets is something special stupid. IF they had wanted to to apply to Muskets then it would have said the 'right to keep and bear Muskets'.Among the many things the anti's don't grasp when they claim the Second Amendment "only applies to muskets" is that at the time it was passed, it was not uncommon for private citizens to own crew-served artillery and for private shipping companies to ship their cargo in 24-gun sloops that could take on ships of the line if necessary.