How I Respond to “ The Fraud is Insignificant and Wouldn’t Change the Outcome”

[Hoji]

Whenever I hear this I reply with;

If I were to take a one liter bottle of water and put a single drop of some urine in it, would it prevent you from taking a sip?

Universally the answer has been, no, it is now a bottle of piss.

I hope it gets the point across

 

[baboon]

 

[Axxe55]

In the case of election or voter fraud, even one fraudulent vote is one too many.

 

[Hoji]

Well, in all fairness most communists would eat a log of shit for a Twitter “like”.
My response is for actual people that are giving up and resigning themselves to 4 years of JOHO

 

[plinkr]

With all due respect, that is not how polling works. There is always a margin of error in any human activity. Only God is perfect. By the way, the exact same argument is used by gun control advocates - if it saves ONE life...

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

 

[Hoji]

With all due respect, that is not how polling works. There is always a margin of error in any human activity. Only God is perfect. By the way, the exact same argument is used by gun control advocates - if it saves ONE life...

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

Each secretary of state of each state must certify that the vote is true and correct, if there fraud it is NOT true and correct.

 

[Axxe55]

Exactly.

Each secretary of state of each state must certify that the vote is true and correct, if there fraud it is NOT true and correct.

 

[plinkr]

Each secretary of state of each state must certify that the vote is true and correct, if there fraud it is NOT true and correct.

And yet every one of the 50 state officials from both parties has stated that there was no fraud. If there was fraud, we have a system to contest the results through the courts, all it takes is a presentation of evidence. So far, that has not happened, maybe this week it will.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

 

[Hoji]

And yet every one of the 50 state officials from both parties has stated that there was no fraud. If there was fraud, we have a system to contest the results through the courts, all it takes is a presentation of evidence. So far, that has not happened, maybe this week it will.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

‘There Was in Fact Fraud That Took Place:’ FEC Chairman Trey Trainor

Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chairman Trey Trainor said that affidavits from the Trump campaign show that fraud has occurred during the November general election. “The massive amounts of affidavits that we see in these cases show that there was in fact fraud that took place,” he said during...

mb.ntd.com

 

[plinkr]

Yeah, anyone can say anything on twitter or on tv, but when he got into court under oath Rudy said there was no fraud.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

 

[Hoji]

Yeah, anyone can say anything on twitter or on tv, but when he got into court under oath Rudy said there was no fraud.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

But there is massive vote tampering.
Fraud has a very specific legal meaning.
My response is for the layman and not to come across as

 

[plinkr]

But there is massive vote tampering.
Fraud has a very specific legal meaning.
My response is for the layman and not to come across as View attachment 234657

Ok then, I expect the legal team to present it's evidence that massive vote tampering occurred. So far they have not.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

 

[Axxe55]

Ok then, I expect the legal team to present it's evidence that massive vote tampering occurred. So far they have not.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

So is your position that, you voted for Trump, but there's not any proof of voter fraud having occurred, and that Trump is out, and Biden is our new president?

And that we just need to suck it up and accept that Biden is the new president?

 

[rotor]

Whenever I hear this I reply with;

If I were to take a one liter bottle of water and put a single drop of some urine in it, would it prevent you from taking a sip?

Universally the answer has been, no, it is now a bottle of piss.

I hope it gets the point across

Don't you mean........
Universally the answer has been, yes, it is now a bottle of piss.

 

[plinkr]

So is your position that, you voted for Trump, but there's not any proof of voter fraud having occurred, and that Trump is out, and Biden is our new president?

And that we just need to suck it up and accept that Biden is the new president?

My position is that when I swore an oath to defend the Constitution, there was no clause that said "as long as my guy is winning".

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

 

[Axxe55]

My position is that when I swore an oath to defend the Constitution, there was no clause that said "as long as my guy is winning".

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

And please tell us where in the Constitution is says voter fraud is legal?

 

[plinkr]

And please tell us where in the Constitution is says voter fraud is legal?

Like I said, let's see the evidence. In court, under oath, not on tv or twitter. Once that is done, I will be shoulder to shoulder with you, brother. It does seem strange that the Dems would tamper with millions of votes in favor of Biden but not bother with the down ballot races where they lost seats in the House.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

 

[rotor]

There is no question that there is voter fraud but proving it will be impossible. If they can hack my credit card ( and they just did ), they can hack my vote. We are going to have Harris and Biden whether we like it or not, and I don't.

 

[satx78247]

Ok then, I expect the legal team to present it's evidence that massive vote tampering occurred. So far they have not.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

plinkr,

PARDON ME for pointing (I'm a LONG-SERVING Election Judge in Bexar County, TX & formerly in Northern NY & Northern VA.) out that NONE of the court cases has ACTUALLY been heard & thus NO evidence has been presented to a JURY to evaluate.=The CROOKED/HATE-FILLED/FAR LEFT DIMocRATS want NO JURY to see what they did & are doing EVERY possible DIRTY TRICK to try to STOP any inquiry into their UTTER DISHONESTY.
(In at least 2 precincts in Philadelphia, EVERY registered voter "voted" & in ALPHABETICAL order in 2020.)

In some areas of ATLANTA, MORE votes were cast on 03NOV20 than the TOTAL NUMBER of persons who live in those areas, including the DEAD, babies, non-residents, non-citizens & people who also voted in other precincts. = Everyone on the voter & tax rolls.

yours, satx

 

[Axxe55]

Like I said, let's see the evidence. In court, under oath, not on tv or twitter. Once that is done, I will be shoulder to shoulder with you, brother. It does seem strange that the Dems would tamper with millions of votes in favor of Biden but not bother with the down ballot races where they lost seats in the House.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

You hang out with Gambler much? Because the two of you seem to have the same opinions on voter fraud.

I'll accept Biden being president when there is ample proof that there wasn't widespread election tampering and voter fraud that got him elected.

The proof hasn't been made available to the public yet, so there sin't any way anyone can give you what you appear to be asking for.

And there are way too many anomalies that point towards the possibility of voter fraud taking place, for it not to be investigated. Counties showing more votes than registered voters. Massive numbers of votes that changed from Trump to Biden leading in just a few short hours, very early in the morning hours. The problems with the Dominion voting systems. And quite a few other problems that could change the entire outcome of this election from Biden to Trump.