Prosecution of Rittenhouse destroyed - NOT GUILTY!!!!

[toddnjoyce]

She is too lazy to do a simple search....

No, it’s not that. Other shît is more important to her than facts.

 

[Renegade]

My goodness, by this time EVERYONE must be aware that Kyle's friend bought the AR15 (not either of the parents) using Kyle's money. IIRC, he (the friend) faces charges for doing that. That AR was kept at the friend's house for them to use when Kyle was in the area VISITING HIS DAD, OR GOING TO WORK.

Kyle's mama took him to Kenosha for work that day, and after work he cleaned graffiti (there are pics of him doing so). Maybe five minutes to the border and another 15 to where he worked. I doubt taking him to work qualifies as sending him to a riot.

After that, Kyle's friend relayed a request/invite from the group of adults that were requested to help protect Car Source (IIRC). It was NEVER the adult biz owners the specifically requested the 17.5 yr old to defend their biz. AFAIK.

I could be wrong, but that's the way I remember it.

Pretty much correct. Has nothing to do with what was being discussed though.

Why would they?

Context was obviously the guy who did not ask them to be there.

I've seen a lot of praise of the rooftop Koreans that protected an L.A. store in the 60s riots. Are you saying that today's shop owners had better not show any resistance when BurnLootMurder comes to their street???

Not familiar with the 60s riots, but am with the King Riots. Again, context is lost. Nothing wrong with a property owner protecting his own property.

 

[msharley]

One thing...

It has been said in the past....that "One MAN with a RIFLE, can MAKE a DIFFERENCE."

Seems that young Mr. Rittenhouse so did.

Item #2.

Am truly impressed with Mr. Rittenhouse's self control....

In two metropolitan police dept's, (namely Chigagoztan & NewYorkCityztan), if this would have been a police shooting?

There would have been 732 shell casings on the ground...Two hundred & seventy three civilian casualties (any number fatal), the perps would have "got clean away".....and in the case of NewYorkCityztan, Epstein did not hang himself..

 

[candcallen]

I saw an attorney, I think she was an attorney, say a skateboard was not a deadly weapon. Or something to that effect. I wonder if she would be willing to participate in a proof of concept to back up her statement.

Or answer to the guy killed after being hit in the head with a skateboard this week.

 

[JCC]

stop the press, who is that?

 

[Brains]

Must be a transplant, don't remember any girls who looked like that in Kenosha

 

[Shady]

Thin piece of wood 6x18 with metal hubs and wheels

Ya no chance that is going to put you down.

I would want to be hit with one as much as I would want to stand down range of one of them pesky .22lr guns.

 

[Shady]

Illinois Dem blasted for calling Wisconsin Christmas rampage ‘karma’​

Illinois Dem blasted for calling Wisconsin Christmas rampage ‘karma’

Mary Lemanski, a social media director for the Democratic Party in DuPage County, began her heartless online tirade by snarkily dismissing the tragedy as “just self-defense.”

nypost.com

 

[TX oddball]

Thin piece of wood 6x18 with metal hubs and wheels

Ya no chance that is going to put you down.

I would want to be hit with one as much as I would want to stand down range of one of them pesky .22lr guns.

 

[Axxe55]

stop the press, who is that?

I'm a bit confused. I watched the entire video of her testimony, and I was left with trying to figure out how her testimony was relevant to the case.

She picked up spent cases from the crime scene. Seems logical if a gun was fired, that there would be spent cases. The prosecutor kept questioning her about clearing the weapon if it had a jam.

What am I missing? She was listed as an expert witness for the defense.

 

[Chuckles]

I'm a bit confused. I watched the entire video of her testimony, and I was left with trying to figure out how her testimony was relevant to the case.

She picked up spent cases from the crime scene. Seems logical if a gun was fired, that there would be spent cases. The prosecutor kept questioning her about clearing the weapon if it had a jam.

What am I missing? She was listed as an expert witness for the defense.

She was one of the first witnesses the defense called, they might have been trying to score points with the jurors.

 

[Tnhawk]

She is too lazy to do a simple search....

FLASHBACK: Man dies after being struck in head with skateboard during fight in California Starbucks

Around 12:30pm on Tuesday, November 24, 2015, authorities received calls regarding an assault with a deadly weapon inside the Starbucks.

thepostmillennial.com

She doesn't want to be confused with facts.

 

[Sasquatch]

Its almost like these media morons WANT to make Mr. Rittenhouse stupidly wealthy from the defamation lawsuits...

 

[Shady]

I don't get why you posted this unless you thought my post said getting whacked in the head is not going to put you down.


Oh I guess sarcasm is lost on the world

 

[Tnhawk]

After paying Rittenhouse and their lawyers to defend their stupidity there will likely be some changes at MSNBC

 

[Axxe55]

She was one of the first witnesses the defense called, they might have been trying to score points with the jurors.

None of that explains the relevance of her testimony.

Of course the defense wants to score points with the jury. Duh! I didn't didn't think the defense's plan was to piss off the jury!

 

[Axxe55]

After paying Rittenhouse and their lawyers to defend their stupidity there will likely be some changes at MSNBC

From what I have read, MSNBC's ratings are further in the toilet than even CNN's ratings.

Maybe her inflammatory remarks were meant to help boost their ratings.

 

[Tnhawk]

None of that explains the relevance of her testimony.

Of course the defense wants to score points with the jury. Duh! I didn't didn't think the defense's plan was to piss off the jury!

They certainly made an impression on the jury.

 

[Chuckles]

None of that explains the relevance of her testimony.

Of course the defense wants to score points with the jury. Duh! I didn't didn't think the defense's plan was to piss off the jury!

I wasn’t trying to explain that. I made a simple statement. Somehow when someone else makes a similar statement you find it agreeable. Almost as if you respond to comments based on your bias towards the person making the comment rather than the substance of the commentary itself.

 

[Axxe55]

I wasn’t trying to explain that. I made a simple statement. Somehow when someone else makes a similar statement you find it agreeable. Almost as if you respond to comments based on your bias towards the person making the comment rather than the substance of the commentary itself.