So what's the point of this?
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
More Trump bashing and an attempt to double down on the theory that he directed Jan 6th and continues to encourage insurrection.
So what's the point of this?
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
That's what thought. Seems like those with TDS just can't help themselves. Oh well. They can spend their time how they want I guess. I will pray for them.More Trump bashing and an attempt to double down on the theory that he directed Jan 6th and continues to encourage insurrection.
Since Trump lost in 2020, I would have thought the dems would want him to run again.Seems like leftists and pretty much anybody who would rather have anybody else as president in '24 are willing to jump on this if it decreases Trump's chances of running or winning.
Great point! They're scared of how difficult it is to pull off the cheat a second time. Although, they shouldn't be, unfortunately.Since Trump lost in 2020, I would have thought the dems would want him to run again.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
I think that's more right than wrong.Since Trump lost in 2020, I would have thought the dems would want him to run again.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
…Trump lost in 2020…
The original statement was somewhat ambiguous, but interpreted in context and through history it wasn't terribly difficult to understand.Lol, of course he clarified.
“No, no, no. I know that’s what I wrote, but That’s not what I meant, guys”
Today, whether he won or lost matters not, but the fraud machine still exists and is still a direct threat to our Constitutional Republic.Apparently this statement is still up for debate.
The Trump you need does not exist.Today, whether he won or lost matters not, but the fraud machine still exists and is still a direct threat to our Constitutional Republic.
Fighting a battle that gains nothing is not worth fighting. 2020 is over. Re-frame the argument to election security, avoid 2020 language and move forward. Trump needs to be the guy that will fight for my beliefs, not someone asking me to fight a battle over 2020 which won't move conservatism forward even if won.
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
I guess it's debatable, but he's not in office so.......Apparently this statement is still up for debate.
Yeah I think they have the mail in ballot and ballot harvesting down.Great point! They're scared of how difficult it is to pull off the cheat a second time. Although, they shouldn't be, unfortunately.
Well saidToday, whether he won or lost matters not, but the fraud machine still exists and is still a direct threat to our Constitutional Republic.
Fighting a battle that gains nothing is not worth fighting. 2020 is over. Re-frame the argument to election security, avoid 2020 language and move forward. Trump needs to be the guy that will fight for my beliefs, not someone asking me to fight a battle over 2020 which won't move conservatism forward even if won.
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
What?I thought you paid more attention to others; especially long timers.
And if a person you cared for saidIf a person I didn't care for said something equally ambiguous I'd be likely to interpret it in a way favorable to my existing biases.
Because it is an idea promulgated by and orange headed nutjob, that's why!“A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”
Just curious why I haven’t seen a whole bunch of people echoing the call to terminate the Constitution.
I don’t believe it’s even been mentioned here yet. Strange.
This is exactly how I feel about you!!! Only moronic dipshit would replace orange headed whatever fucking word you chose.The sooner the Orange Headed Shitgibbon is out of our lives the better off we will be!
I think the part you are stuck on is "allows for".And if a person you cared for said
“A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.”, you’d interpret that to mean something other than what the clearly written words state.
Just wait until folks start complaining about "social security" and other **** that is is a fools errand...then you'll see them sell their children into economic slavery.“A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”
Just curious why I haven’t seen a whole bunch of people echoing the call to terminate the Constitution.
I don’t believe it’s even been mentioned here yet. Strange.