With all due respect you should stop posting and start reading/learning.
No offense taken. I agree, and am attempting to by asking questions. I admit I made myself look like an ass but I'm trying to get some info now.
With all due respect you should stop posting and start reading/learning.
Actually, it is suppose to mean you used the wrong word...but it is "scot free"...
www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/scot free.html
As to whether Zimmerman was guilty of breaking any laws, tell me which ones he allegedly broke? It is not illegal to follow someone unless you are trespassing, it is not illegal to confront someone if you suspect they are up to nefarious activities, and a 911 operator has no legal authority to tell a private citizen what they can or cannot do.
But it is illegal to physically attack someone, which is what Martin did. It was a stupid move on his part, and it cost him his life.
Zimmerman was acquitted because there was no evidence he broke the law. It's that simple.
Is it possible that GZ could face Federal Charges?
There was previous talk of the Feds charging GZ with a hate crime. No double jeopardy there.No. No double jeopardy
Actually Zimmerman broke the law. Florida makes it illegal to shoot someone. That is what this trial was mostly about. He was justified in that illegal act, making it a justifiable homicide.
I do know that he did not break any laws. The only thing I thought he did was follow Martin till Martin finally had enough. I now know that is not the case. This is one case I just got sick of hearing about so I am terribly behind. Now I want to know why he was prosecuted in the first place, if he did nothing wrong. I thought the stand your ground law came with immunity to the person who had to use deadly force. Or maybe that's the castle doctrine.
**sigh*** self defense laws do not work that way; however, you do know that the prosecutor did not want to prosecute because it was a clear cut case of self defense, and the police chief agreed. It became political, the prosecutor was replaced in a political move, and the police chief fired.
You don't have your story strait [sic]
There was previous talk of the Feds charging GZ with a hate crime. No double jeopardy there.
Yes I did hear about that. Why would that happen if it was a clear but case of self defense? What was there to gein politically?
My wife totally thought he was guilty....but she can't get past the part where Zimmerman was told not to follow Martin. I tried to explain the jury just had to decide if it was self defense....after the altercation started. Myself....I think Zimmerman was a cocky bastard looking to make a name for himself.......but he was not guilty of murder.
O says... if I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon. The mom hears the 911 call in the mayor's office. DOJ sends folks to participate in the protest rallies. Police chief is fired because he won't prosecute. The lead detective is demoted because he won't recommend arrest.
A special prosecutor is appointed and the grand jury is skipped.
I think his prosecution had something to do with the "railroad." Again... just my opinion.
Racial division helps keep democrats in power.
Neither Castle doctrine or stand your ground laws prevent prosecution. In fact, whether or not a person meets the requirements of those laws is a matter of fact for a judge or jury.
Obama wants to bring Federal charges on him....
Actually Zimmerman broke the law. Florida makes it illegal to shoot someone. That is what this trial was mostly about. He was justified in that illegal act, making it a justifiable homicide.