And next there will be what? A training battalion full of humans with both breasts and a swinging Richard?
Not likely. How many TGs are even interested in joining the military? They'll get, what, MAYBE one every couple of years across all branches?
And next there will be what? A training battalion full of humans with both breasts and a swinging Richard?
I dont know. Might be the next big thing after the gays get their "rights". Then "queers". Their term. Not a slur. Those people who dont identify with either sex. Then go back and forth between them. Where my polygamists at? Need to get them "rights" son! Then the next group then the next.
Giving people more rights to do things that don't hurt others? Now you're cookin' with gas!
1.) The old ridiculous "It goes against nature argument."
List of animals displaying homosexual behavior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Males have intercourse with females to procreate. Period." LOLZ. Where have you been for the last several million years? Did you even go to high school?
Correction...YOU didn't give a shit. You can't speak for the entire military. I was in too, and we corrected one of our guys for being too flamboyant because it was causing problems in the unit.2.) No, and no. As to the first count, when I was in almost no one gave a shit. As to the second count, if anything they pander to it.
It's not just group showers. It's being in the same showering area...because guess what? People will walk to and from the shower without a towel as well. As far as sneaking in...the reason it "worked" is because no one knew. If know one knows, then it doesn't disrupt anything. That's why the don't ask don't tell policy didn't bother me. It's when we have to change the military to conform to a small subgroups desires that I (and many others in and out of the military) have a problem.3.) Group showers always come across as gay and those questions are going to be there no matter what. What, you seriously believe gay people haven't "Snuck into" the military when they were banned? How many times does a person even have to shower with them anyway? Couldn't this problem be easily solved by installing private stalls?
The standards are. The people aren't...or won't be if lib's have their way.4.) More BS. The standards you talk about are clearly defined and NOT subject to interpretation. At worst some new standards will have to written, which will probably make several Majors and Lt. Cols. have several orgasms now that they have some new mundane thing to write pages of regulations for.
"I'm all for equal rights of each and every person... except when I'm not." FIFY.
"A mental disorder is a mental disorder." LOZ. Homosexuality hasn't been classified by as a mental disorder since the 1973 in the US and 1992 worldwide.
"The definition of marriage is the definition of marriage." Then define it, please, and explain why it has some magical properties no other law has which prevent it from ever being changed.
"The military functions best under a fully uniformed structure--mind,body, and spirit."
What the Hell is this even supposed to mean?
Seriously though, what's your farm doing? Is it something that violates the rights of the neighbor?
I think your post was pretty well put as a civil discussion and stating the basis for your opinions......but you completely lost me at the last paragraph with "or so you say".
Whether or not you agree, questioning someone's military service with no evidence otherwise is just a chicken shit thing to do.
You mean like saying someone didn't graduate high school simply because they disagree? LOL. My statement wasn't at all chicken shit or demeaning. It's saying that if you served as you say...then you'll understand.
Not anti social in any way, just the acceptance that something can be aggravating and we may disagree with it, but realize it does not infringe on our rights.
If the neighbor farmer uses a 30 year old jug of Permatol to spray his fence line and it washes in to my fields, he violates my rights by damaging my property. If he has 3 wives and all are happy I have had no rights violated, even if I think it is morally wrong.
C'mon BC, that can't really be your reasoning can it? I can't get a wife because he is marrying all the women?
Lol, who a woman chooses to marry is not my concern, even if she chooses another man instead of me. It does not violate my rights in any way, even if it were to hurt my feelings.
Those are not the types of effects laws should be based on and that's probably the worst example you've ever given.
You mean like saying someone didn't graduate high school simply because they disagree?
It's saying that if you served as you say...then you'll understand.
Him having 3 wives doesnt affect you? What if you dont have a wife? Am I calling for the state to redistribute his wives? No. But it does affect you.
And be responsible for the damages he causes.