That is a fair point. The NFA tax was supposed to bar all but affluent people from owning such weapons. They just haven't changed the tax amount in all these years. I'm not sure how many people on here can afford to have private security and buy a "license" for everything they want. People that would be leaving would have something to lose, but not enough money to protect it.So, should we agree to restrict the thread to considerations that only those who have an upper-middle-class or lower income would need to heed?
Gun and self defense rights are very important, but I would focus more on property rights and economic freedom. Any good candidates in that area?
So Ayn Rand's, Nicola Tesla's, and Albert Einstein's families should have stayed put? If the government is seizing people's property and livelihoods, and loading the people that speak out into traincars, you would rather make your children orphans by martyring yourself than make a new life somewhere else?Im not believing what I'm reading on here! Are we gonna give up this easy?
Just let the no-goods that dont work, and just TAKE from all of us, just turn it
over to em, huh? Like I said, I'm not believing I'm seeing this on a gun forum,
of all places! Damn!
I very deeply understand the desire to fight, but there are other factors to consider. I can see through to the other side and that makes me want to stay and fight, but it would probably behoove many to flee.
This thread is about the leaving; not the staying.
Lots of confederate soldier's homes were destroyed while they were out fighting.The idea of fighting is a bloody and cruel one. Your family would most likely end up in prison while you are away fighting. If not, your children hungry and may or may not have a home to live in.
If I had no other choice but to live in a "socialist utopia" I'd pick a Scandinavian country. I'm hoping there are other choices.The Finns love their guns.
That tooYou sure its not because the ref picked up the flag?