Where do you get that idea? I don't think anyone is advocating anything like that. What we're discussing is the [intentionally] flawed characterization and the potential abuse of privacy when any means is asserted as justified by the ends. For example the mere existence of an account or implicated IP is often considered "proof" of access/wrongdoing when anyone can create an account pointing to anyone else through a few simple techniques. No one is suggesting protecting child pornographers, what I am suggesting is violating anyone's rights even to catch a child pornographer is unacceptable.
Last edited: