TRUTH!No, it really doesn't. There's a very clear distinction between an inanimate object and a highly venomous living creature. There's also a very clear distinction between wanting something banned, and feeling that only responsible people SHOULD (not "should be allowed") own and handle animals that pose a significant danger to anyone who comes into contact with them.
Just because you think someone shouldn't do something doesn't mean that you also think that they shouldn't be allowed to do it.
The false equivalences you're using in your argument is more lib like than anything else in this thread.