IMO individual liberties, the economy, and foreign policy are more important issues than "family values". Family values are the responsibility of the family, not the government.
In that regard I think Stovall is a better choice, atleast on the economy side since is a small business man and knows the issues they deal with. I'm not sure how Stockman has earned his living in the past but I've read that he's had financial troubles in the past and his campaign is in debt.
That being said I may be biased in that I like alcohol, tobacco, firearms, strippers (female nudity in general), and violent movies/game. I prefer politicians who don't try to force morality on others.
FWIW Stovall is Christian and a family man, just because his campaign did not respond to some not well known survey doesn't really say much.
Dwayne Stovall Debate Highlights - UT Arlington - YouTube
You think? Even while the federal governement is attacking family values? What about Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty? He spoke his own convictions and the gay lobby went bezerk, then A&E suspended him from the show. Public Advocate was one of the very first groups to act on his behalf and millions of outraged Americans put the heat on A&E and he was reinstated. Now the Abomination wants legislation granting homosexuals special protections, including making it unlawful for anyone to speak out against them, forcing churches to hire them and disregard contradictions of their own beliefs, as well as making it illegal for even day care centers to screen them.
Yeah, family values are the responsibility of the family home and we have democommie politicians that want to legislate against that. Stovall not returning his survey might be indicitive of his unwillingness to support the rights of family values. The field is crowded, but Stovall and Cornyn were but a very few who did not participate in the survey. Do we have any proof he would act any differently on gun-control??? Saying and doing are 2 different things. Stockman has a record of doing and Stovall has no record! Great, he's a businessman and Ted Cruz is a constitutional Law Scholar. George Bush was also a businessman, I think I'd rather have a constitutional law scholar in the senate and fortunately we do. I'd also rather have a senator with a proven track record who also knows a thing or two about procedure at least in one of the houses of congress.
Last edited: