if by "getting intoxicated" you mean any BAC at a .02 then I'll accept the "fix" A beer or two may be ok.
Little fix there.....
Your "intoxication" level, if confronted, is at the discretion of the officer involved. Is it worth the hassle and possible expense involved? It's simple, in my humble opinion. Going to drive? Going to carry? DON'T DRINK!
I know what the law says,
(2) "Intoxicated" means:
(A) not having the normal use of mental or physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol
and I also know that scientific evidence and studies indicate that your judgement is the first thing to be affected by alcohol. So, my opinion is that at a BAC of .02 you are "intoxicated" as your mental judgement is impaired. We should hold ourselves to a higher standard when we carry, which brings me back to my original statement that we should not drink.
I know what the law says,
(2) "Intoxicated" means:
(A) not having the normal use of mental or physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol
and I also know that scientific evidence and studies indicate that your judgement is the first thing to be affected by alcohol. So, my opinion is that at a BAC of .02 you are "intoxicated" as your mental judgement is impaired. We should hold ourselves to a higher standard when we carry, which brings me back to my original statement that we should not drink.
Sometimes the simplest solution is the best.I have an idea. If you must drink, don't carry and don't drive. It's one of my rules . I do drink but never until I'm where I plan to lay my head for the night. Otherwise, I'm armed and sober. It's simple and responsible. If you have a Texas CHL, the instructor told you what the consequences may be. You may or may not think it fair, but "It is what it is". Blaze away. I'm way too old to give a damn what irresponsible folks think.
I don't drive if I've been drinking. It's a hard concept to understand but you either bring a pillow and sleeping bag or a driver.I was on jury selection for a DWI case. It was the young fellow's second offence. I was not selected for the case. Leading up to jury selection the court and attorney's bombarded us with the definition of intoxication. There was one fellow, an engineer, that could not get past the blood-alcohol content (BAC) test. There are other measures for the officer to make an arrest for suspected DWI as TXI laid out for us here. Once the officer makes the arrest and the DA decides to press charges, it is up to the jury to decide guilt. Not the officer, not that DA.
It sounds to me as though the officer did the job as prescribed.
I don't drive if I've been drinking. It's a hard concept to understand but you either bring a pillow and sleeping bag or a driver.
If your balls are hanging out, you have had WAY too much to drink and will probably be in trouble regardless of whether you are carrying a firearm.
I don't drive if I've been drinking. It's a hard concept to understand but you either bring a pillow and sleeping bag or a driver.
They'll still charge you for DWI for sleeping in your car.
As a tag into this, my recently turned 21 daughter got pulled over for DWI. Pretty sure she's going to be convicted.
Am I reading right that it is 5 years after the conviction before she is eligible to apply for her CHL?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As a tag into this, my recently turned 21 daughter got pulled over for DWI. Pretty sure she's going to be convicted.
Am I reading right that it is 5 years after the conviction before she is eligible to apply for her CHL?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mike,As a tag into this, my recently turned 21 daughter got pulled over for DWI. Pretty sure she's going to be convicted.
Am I reading right that it is 5 years after the conviction before she is eligible to apply for her CHL?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk