What I got to say ain't fit for a public forum.
Texas Penal Code: Title 2 said:Sec. 9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY. (a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other's trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property.
(b) A person unlawfully dispossessed of land or tangible, movable property by another is justified in using force against the other when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to reenter the land or recover the property if the actor uses the force immediately or in fresh pursuit after the dispossession and:
(1) the actor reasonably believes the other had no claim of right when he dispossessed the actor; or
(2) the other accomplished the dispossession by using force, threat, or fraud against the actor.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and
(3) he reasonably believes that:
(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or
(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Am I right to assume this is in the area called Westgate? Not that I'm familiar with the area besides what I found on the map, but I agree with Wiked that it was a group of kids, probably younger teens, and not anything organized. I would be willing to wager that they also don't live to far from the scene and have hidden access to the property, maybe via a wooded area along the property. If that's the case, I wouldn't be surprise if you found a trail leading to one of their homes.
Hide in the woods with paintball guns. Full auto paintball guns. Bring friends with full auto paintball guns. Lots of friends. Tag the taggers with your own paint. Rinse, lather, repeat. .......
Not finding any info on the WGB's ? Any info on this bunch?
AKA the west gay boys.
that ilikeSomeone should start a FB page stating that they are the REAL WGB of Austin Texas and the other ones are a bunch of pussies and see if any of them respond.