Remember, they are below the equator so the bullet goes up instead of down.
The difference in Coriolis is why they cut left hand threads into barrels there.
Remember, they are below the equator so the bullet goes up instead of down.
Also, I had a 10 minute conversation with one of my students on the fact that physics does not allow the "bending" of a shot, ex. Wanted. He wouldn't believe me and told me he saw it on youtube. I stared for about 30 seconds then wondered about how much it would hurt if I put a pencil in my eye.
The difference in Coriolis is why they cut left hand threads into barrels there.
I guess the thing that bothers me the most is when the hero (or bad guy) has been fighting or what not and it comes to the dramatic moment and they a. rack the slide, b. pump the shotgun, or c. pull back the hammer off the gun. . . . . .So where they fighting with an empty gun the whole time or what?!!
I think/hope that is a joke! Those things are the size of small Howitzer rounds!
However, there is one movie out there that I recall having somewhat realistic gun play. Travis knows the name of it, but I can't ever remember it. They are caught in a shoot-out at some S. American village, one guy has a 1911 and he's reloading by pulling the mag out with his teeth, cocking the gun one-handed off the rear sight, all kinds of actual techniques. The 1911 has a 7 round shot sequence too. Lots of reloading. The only downside is that there is a guy with a snub-nose revolver sniping people 30 - 50 yards away, LOL.
The difference in Coriolis is why they cut left hand threads into barrels there.
The Brits rifled their Enfields in reverse for deployment to the Southern Hemisphere. They actually believed it was necessary.
LOL, I was joking. I guess they weren't.
Hey... if the Brits did it, it's gotta be a good idea. They know how to make great gear for killing, even if they're not so good at the actual execution all the time.
Spetsnaz feared the .303 Lee Enfield rifles in Afghanistan. It was a sorry Muj who they caught with one...
I took a 10 point whitetail buck at 300 yards with my customized Jennings .22 that shoots 1/4 MOA...
My favorite is how every pistol makes the same single action Army revolver cocking noise when it comes out. Even if it's a Glock. I need to trade my G19 in for a Hollywood version. It'd have a 62 round flush fitting magazine, knock people to the ground in a single shot, and make the cool SAA revolver cocking noise every time I pulled it out.
However, there is one movie out there that I recall having somewhat realistic gun play. Travis knows the name of it, but I can't ever remember it. They are caught in a shoot-out at some S. American village, one guy has a 1911 and he's reloading by pulling the mag out with his teeth, cocking the gun one-handed off the rear sight, all kinds of actual techniques. The 1911 has a 7 round shot sequence too. Lots of reloading. The only downside is that there is a guy with a snub-nose revolver sniping people 30 - 50 yards away, LOL.
Back in Nam I shot at a guy 8 times with my 1911, missed 8 times, threw the gun and hit him in the head. Buddy then shot him while I was putting on lipstick and getting ready to kiss my a$$ goodbye.
Hey if Joe Willie Nameth can wear pantyhose on the football field, I can wear lipstick on the battlefield.
The movie is Way of the Gun (awesome movie):
YouTube - The Way of the Gun Shootout
YouTube - Way of the Gun - Realistic room clearing and tactics
This is a required part for most movies.
The actual science is terrible in most movies. The idea of momentum just doesn't exists.
It annoys me when you see a guy firing a fully automatic rifle in each hand with no recoil.
Or have you ever looked at the physics of a movie like Eraser? Fun reads if you are a nerd (like me).
I guess the thing that bothers me the most is when the hero (or bad guy) has been fighting or what not and it comes to the dramatic moment and they a. rack the slide, b. pump the shotgun, or c. pull back the hammer off the gun. . . . . .So where they fighting with an empty gun the whole time or what?!!
Probably because they used dum-dum rounds for a good while. The rifle itself isn't that accurate or great, but the dum-dum makes the .303 just nasty.