EARLY voting I might add!!!!
SCOTUS justices are there specifically to not be political.He's trying to appear impartial by playing both sides. I wish that he would be more of a constitutionalist and leave politics out of it.
As it is, when the dust settles, we'll be called "winners"!I’ve been seeing a lot of celebrities tweeting inflammatory things like “burn it down” and “this is war”.
I find that so freaking hypocritical, since they are such a bunch of clowns who cannot even be accountable for their own security and safety. Who will fight their war for them? George Soros conscripts at $15/hour?
If pro 2A conservatives and Libertarians use terms like “fight”, “war”, or the like, we’d be labeled “war mongers”
First of all, that was a statement made by her granddaughter, can I really believe that her granddaughter isn't being political? Second, that's not a justice's decision to make, even if she actually did say that. But yes, when I saw that statement I wondered why someone that smart would say "new president is elected" and not after the election, unless it was meant to be a prediction.Ginsburg most fervent wishiswas that she not be replaced until a "new" President is elected?
Trump getting the news and some discussion about the coming nomination. Hate on the guy for his normal demeanor if you want but his reaction to being told she's dead was damn classy.
All the “war” talk is so tiresome.
These twats have NO idea of war.
There is an old saying: Be mindful of what you ask for. You just might get it.
These rubeswouldwill shit themselves blindifwhen“The Right”saddledsaddles up andwentgoes hot.
Again, we can stand three defections (Pence would cast the deciding vote, think I mistakenly said "four" in an earlier post). So that lets Collins and Murkowski off the hook, plus one other. And if a woman is nominated, that might rope in those two.
If a R senator won, he will go with the nominee with no concern about reelection (voters will forget in six minutes, much less six years). If a R senator (e.g., Collins) lost, they will have nothing to lose by backing the nominee.
Many of us think that something has already happened to Roberts. He has been erratic, at best.
In a perfect world Trump would appoint a hard core Constituionalist who is gay, black, female and under 40 years old.
As mentioned, you left out Mittens, but the problem is the language Grassley (and others) have been using. Could be a bunch of votes we can't count on. Hopefully they just need to be bribed, but so much will depend on the candidate, and how focus groups in each Senate race (35 of them!!) suggest the nominee effects voters.
And "woman" sounds nice on the surface, no "metoo" BS, no fake rape BS.....until you look at how they're going to paint Amy Barrett. Abortion is something even the RINOs support these days, and very few Senators in close races can afford to say they're against abortion.
Not that simple. An R might win, but be a RINO, so it depends why that R won. Collins might have nothing to lose, but she has something to gain --> maybe the Democrats offer her a better bribe to vote against.
He's had two seizures. Not in the best of health. He could be the next to go. Sotomayor is a diabetic, and could go any minute. Thomas is already old and he's overweight -- black men don't live long with those traits. Breyer is over 80. Alito is no spring chicken. It's critically important to re-elect Trump. He could be the first President to seat a majority by himself since FDR.
There are none. But will be you be OK if Don Willet identifies as gay, black, female and under 40?
Just do a quick web search for the list Trump released recently.Just curious, has anyone heard any other names that Trump may be considering for justice?
I posted a ten day old list earlier. Don't make me find it!Just do a quick web search for the list Trump released recently.
Whoa. You GREATLY underestimate these Democrats....no fake rape BS...