Now we're getting somewhere. It has nothing to do with the gun itself, but with your preferences. So in all this "empirical evidence" we have a strong bias that won't let you say "it's ok, just not for me". The data is there, just maybe not by the original poster. You can watch iraqveteran8888 for video proof of what the gun can handle, not just an article stating they put X number of rounds through it. They ARE a source that is in the original poster's video as well. I guarantee their torture test went farther than just sending rounds down range under optimal conditions. And yes, lack of cleaning would still be optimal when compared to what the Hi - Point was subjected to (obstructed barrel, freezing in dry ice, etc.).
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
Lol, if you say so. We obviously won't agree when you believe real world use is outweighed by "scenarios" involving trips to Antarctica.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk