Make that a law and we can talk. Until then, suck it. Just because some (or even lots of somebodies) wish to voluntarily release their last ten tax records when running for federal office doesn't create an imperative to do so. Not even a little bit.I agree. However I am also supportive that your tax reports from the last ten years to until you die are public if you run for federal office.
This whole thing should be held in check until all appeals of the District Judge's ruling are exhausted. And last I heard, the Supremes haven't weighed in yet . . .Congress does not have the right to subpoena at whim. Liberal judge backs liberal congress. Neither has any respect for the constitution.
After my taxes are paid, my money ain't nobody's effin business.
That's kind of what I said...Make that a law and we can talk. Until then, suck it. Just because some (or even lots of somebodies) wish to voluntarily release their last ten tax records when running for federal office doesn't create an imperative to do so. Not even a little bit.
Unless you break the law.
Therein lies the confounding factor.
I'd be shocked if he has not broken some laws along the way.
That is why this investigating will be infinite.
Isnt that the "play"? <wink,wink>If they are opening that door, then they all should be under such scrutiny.
No, that's not kinda what you said. Sorry.That's kind of what I said...
Unless you break the law.
Therein lies the confounding factor.
I'd be shocked if he has not broken some laws along the way.
That is why this investigating will be infinite.
Exactly. If Congress has reason to suspect that criminal activity has been, is being, or is about to be committed, they have every right to refer the matter to the Department of Justice for their tender touch.Congress has no authority to engage in criminal investigations.
Well that's like, your opinion, man...No, that's not kinda what you said. Sorry.
I, for one, do NOT want a law requiring candidates for federal office to release their last ten year's income tax forms. I couldn't care less if idiots wish to voluntarily release theirs; however, I happen to think one is a dumbass to to do so. And I don't want a law requiring folks to be dumbasses.
That's for crimes. This is not under criminal laws.I’m confused as to the PC used to subpoena the information. Barr needs to be looking into privacy law violations and pressing charges against folks.
If they can do this to a connected rich guy, we are all screwed!!
This really bad for the country. Using these powers to fight your political enemies has no end. When Rs get back House, they then will investigate Biden's kids, Chelsea Clinton, get Clinton tax returns since 2016, there is no end.
Except for Trump, so very true.I do not believe our current crop of Republicans have the testicles to retaliate in kind. Weak, weak, weak.....
Except for Trump, so very true.
The Dude. Last refuge of slackitude.Well that's like, your opinion, man...
I’m confused as to the PC used to subpoena the information. Barr needs to be looking into privacy law violations and pressing charges against folks.
If they can do this to a connected rich guy, we are all screwed!!