Evidently they weren’t dealing.I highly doubt that anyone on this forum would stand for heroin dealing. Lots of crimes need to be dealt with ending in death for the perpetrators.
ETA: Ninja’d.
Evidently they weren’t dealing.I highly doubt that anyone on this forum would stand for heroin dealing. Lots of crimes need to be dealt with ending in death for the perpetrators.
I would. 100 years ago, your local heroin dealer was your local pharmacist. All things considered, I'm not convinced the way we currently handle heroin distribution is superior to that model.I highly doubt that anyone on this forum would stand for heroin dealing.
Some do, yes, but I don't put dealing in illegal drugs in that category.Lots of crimes need to be dealt with ending in death for the perpetrators.
I would. 100 years ago, your local heroin dealer was your local pharmacist. All things considered, I'm not convinced the way we currently handle heroin distribution is superior to that model.Some do, yes, but I don't put dealing in illegal drugs in that category.
I don't. But I wouldn't mind it if it happened at the local pharmacy.I'm glad you welcome dope dealing into your niegborhood.
It wouldn't be fine by me and it wouldn't happen in my neighborhood.All the junkies wandering around trying to steal you shit to get a fix is fine by me.
There have always been bad neighborhoods, now and 100 years ago and 1000 years ago. The presence or absence of heroin is a factor in creating them but it's hardly determinative.Where I live I have bridge troll/junkies wandering around day & night.
I'm glad we agree on that.Do I think the war on drugs has been a huge cluster ****? Absolutely!
So..if this story keeps rolling the direction that it is now, eventually, Ms Nicolas' mother (the rat) will be splitting a large sum of money with her lawyer huh?
So..if this story keeps rolling the direction that it is now, eventually, Ms Nicolas' mother (the rat) will be splitting a large sum of money with her lawyer huh?
Was reported by HPD to be the mother. It is somewhere in this thread.Without the original call slip, is it safe to assume the ‘mother’ referred to is actually ms Nicholas’s mother?
That reporting has been vague from the beginning, as far as I can tell.
Was reported by HPD to be the mother. It is somewhere in this thread.
Not unlike our current opioid problem? Lets face it we are a bunch of nobodies get fed a bunch of crap from politicians & lobbiest pushing big Pharm products. It's got to the point where big Pharm & cartel are both via for the same huge market & profits!I don't. But I wouldn't mind it if it happened at the local pharmacy.
It wouldn't be fine by me and it wouldn't happen in my neighborhood.
I highly doubt that anyone on this forum would stand for heroin dealing. Lots of crimes need to be dealt with ending in death for the perpetrators.
Somewhere in this thread the is a quote from a press release or related news report that ID'd the called as the mother.My understanding is that HPD reported a mother calling to say her daughter was using in the house, based on an anonymous call.
“The drug probe leading up to the botched bust started on Jan. 8, when officials say an anonymous caller phoned police to complain that her daughter was "doing drugs" inside the Harding Street home.”
https://www.chron.com/news/houston-...onnected-to-deadly-raid-shootout-13598143.php
Somewhere in this thread the is a quote from a press release or related news report that ID'd the called as the mother.
If the caller was the mother, her daughter was in fact inside the house. Not too hard to see the connection.Probably about as reliable as the original version of the shooting. Maybe having the same source (HPD) is the cause? It's called CYA anyway you can and they are running out of things to say.
If the caller was the mother, her daughter was in fact inside the house. Not too hard to see the connection.
The mother was doing drugs also? Now that is screwed!But, was she doing drugs.