I shoot 1000yds with my 10x Leupold Mk4. The clarity is amazing. I can see the target better with that Leupold at 10x than I can with my Nikon Monarch at 16x.
At 1000 yards, I would not be able to spot the target to know which way to point the scope!
Same here. At 300 yards, my 10x Nightforce barely gets the job done.
I've taken shots at medium game out to about 300yds with my 1-5 Weaver.
I'm not saying you can track your holes at 1000yds. Not even close. But I can ring a stop sign sized piece of steel with regularity.
I've taken shots at medium game out to about 300yds with my 1-5 Weaver. I didn't feel like I was lacking in optics. A lot of it is personal preference; by no means am I saying I'm a better shot than anyone, because I'm not. lol
Don't overlook Primary Arms stuff.
They are a Texas (Houston) based company, and I have read/heard nothing but good things about their scopes. They ain't that expensive neither.
Sent from a B-52 flying over Russia.
I have a drawer with a few of those cheap starter scopes. Found out the hard way to "buy once Cry once" IMO
Don't overlook Primary Arms stuff.
They are a Texas (Houston) based company, and I have read/heard nothing but good things about their scopes. They ain't that expensive neither.
Sent from a B-52 flying over Russia.
I spent two days in a shooting class with Brian Zins (multi-time U.S. pistol champ) about a month ago. The guy could see all my .22 bullet holes at 25 yards without optical aid. He'd stop, tell me the shape of my group and why it was the way it was, then move on down the line. I'd look through the scope and see exactly what he had just described.I was not being critical of anyone at all. I am just saying at 1000 yards, my old eyes would not be able to see the target. Forget the holes... I can't see those at 25 yards.