Ain't much use in running magnums subsonic anyways.
Yeah, I just thought it would be cool if I could get the length of .38 special down to around 9mm. Could almost double capacity and be pretty quiet. Figure 9mm load data would be close.
Ain't much use in running magnums subsonic anyways.
Yeah, I just thought it would be cool if I could get the length of .38 special down to around 9mm. Could almost double capacity and be pretty quiet. Figure 9mm load data would be close.
Maybe I should just get a mare's leg to thread.
Maybe this ^^^^^^, but if not, I'd recommend keeping the 20" barrel.
Because . . .
Thanks. It's a 1904 rifle, 24" barrel. Still loads, feeds, fires & ejects like it's supposed to.
bob
Longer barrels usually mean a quieter report to begin with.
My 73 was built in 1886 shoots 38/40 which I use this gun and reload for it each month at my Cowboy Action Shooting club. It is nice to see that kind of quality that continues to work after 129 years.
The 38 WCF is lots easier to find bullets for reloading (.401). I was torn between 38 WCF and 44 WCF and settled on the 44.
.427 is smaller than the .429 of the common 44 cal in modern arms. I size em down when I need to.
I keep my eyes open for model 73, 92 and 94.
bob
My 73 was built in 1886 shoots 38/40 which I use this gun and reload for it each month at my Cowboy Action Shooting club. It is nice to see that kind of quality that continues to work after 129 years.