Looks like a high point to me. I like how he tucked it under his arm.What is that long gun? I'm thinking its a high point, but I'm not sure.
Lady in the all blue dress was smart climbing under the table.. if she had her cell phone she could have dialed 911 then pushed it into the corner... That was fast, and with some methodology, like they've done this before, or even practiced for it.. Career criminals I would say..
Man, I sent two 17 year old punks to prison for 5 years each. I didnt feel bad about it at all..I was happy to keep them from stealing somebody elses stuff.On the first point, yeah they appeared to know what they were doing, and it didn't look like they were first timers. On the second... they look like kids. One of them looked really small, like a teenager.
I still won't cry for them when they rob the wrong place and end up dead, though.
+1I simply find the CHL comment in the story just plain stupid.
That man didnt need a CHL to go to his car and get his weapon, and I dont see anyone's argument being vaild as to " What he should have done". He was the man that those SOB took $600 off of.
If it were me, I would have done the same thing, but I would have had a AR15 in my PU. I wouldnt have stoped untill all the were dead or had their hands out in front of them while laying on the ground! I would have been so damn made simply because of the way that little POS punk threw that old man on the ground.
If I had a gun on me while inside the store, I dont think I would have used it. 3 of them and too many other people. I wouldnt have wanted to create a gunfight where others would have gotten shot.
What that man did was very respectable to his community and the others in that waffle house. I just wished he would have killed all 3 of those SOB's.
11 News legal analyst Gerald Treece said he was.
"I didn’t say it was prudent. I just say it’s not illegal," Treece said. "They were not only using deadly force, they had automatic weapons aimed at him. He has a right under Texas law to protect himself and protect his property."
And that even includes scenarios, such as the Waffle House incident, when the danger is no longer imminent. Treece said it’s called the "right of fresh pursuit."