I'm going to be getting another 1911, and am trying to decide between a loaded stainless, or a Range Officer.
I like the loaded SS because I'd like another stainless steel gun, and what better gun to have in stainless than a 1911?
However, I've heard that the R.O. is tighter fit, which I like. I don't care for the parkerized finish or target sights, but i'd much rather choose a well fit, tight 1911. However, if the loaded is just as tight as the R.O. with a decent trigger, i'd much rather go with that.
The gun will be used for HD and carry. I've carried a 1911 before, and am perfectly fine with it. Didn't give me any problems. I understand that the R.O. isn't perfect for carry with the adjustable target rear sight, and that carrying a tight fit 1911 wouldn't be the best option for those who think loose is the way to go, but I can live with the consequences of my actions.
Anyone have any experience with both who can attest to if the R.O. actually is built tighter and has a better trigger than the Loaded Stainless?
I like the loaded SS because I'd like another stainless steel gun, and what better gun to have in stainless than a 1911?
However, I've heard that the R.O. is tighter fit, which I like. I don't care for the parkerized finish or target sights, but i'd much rather choose a well fit, tight 1911. However, if the loaded is just as tight as the R.O. with a decent trigger, i'd much rather go with that.
The gun will be used for HD and carry. I've carried a 1911 before, and am perfectly fine with it. Didn't give me any problems. I understand that the R.O. isn't perfect for carry with the adjustable target rear sight, and that carrying a tight fit 1911 wouldn't be the best option for those who think loose is the way to go, but I can live with the consequences of my actions.
Anyone have any experience with both who can attest to if the R.O. actually is built tighter and has a better trigger than the Loaded Stainless?
Last edited: